The latest news and live updates on the 2024 election. Follow the Trump-Vance and Harris-Walz campaigns ahead of the presidential election in November.
Hmm… I wonder why a certain user who’s been posting non-stop about third-party candidates for the entire lifespan of their account chose to ignore this particular article. One would assume it’s important for the voting public to know about this, no?
Because it’s already been posted here and this sub doesn’t allow duplicate posts. I don’t know what user you’re referring to, but I’ve commented in this thread.
If multiple people are guessing that you’re a bot or a paid propagandist you may see that as a sign you’re terminally online and should go explore the real world for a bit.
Maybe you could develop a sense of personality and lose the burden of supporting a failed style of governance
If multiple people are calling me a paid propagandist I assume they are brainwashed idiots and I double-down.
You know, they cannot stand what I have to say so they have to resort to slander. They are just shitty people lmao. I like to imagine how stupid their life must be. How do they wake up, go to their job, check their blood tainted 401k, kiss their wife, all of that knowing in the depht of their being that their are selfish scumbags. It’s kinda sad really.
Unfortunately if I name this person there’s a good likelihood this discussion gets removed since the rules prohibit calling out bad faith actors, even the painstakingly obvious ones. So I’ll leave you with this: you needn’t look far to find that which you seek.
It’s @UniversalMonk@lemmy.world. It’s always @UniversalMonk@lemmy.world, and it’s so unbearably obvious that they should’ve been banned long, long ago because all they do is pollute this community with Russian propaganda. I don’t honestly care at this point if they are or are not literally paid (their post/comment frequency is staggering if they aren’t); it’s nevertheless the effect they have. This community is objectively a worse place with them here.
Or some people just don’t agree with the echo chamber. Just because the don’t change their minds and vote differently than others, doesn’t mean it’s in bad faith. Thanks! :)
They would accuse anyone of being a foreign agent lmao. That’s what you say when you want to discredit a view point. You accuse them of being moscow agents.
It’s cointelpro all over again. They want to silence pro-palestinians views because they know they belongs in jail for supporting genocide. So they call everybody else russian.
Beside, these idiots are the one imposing their news to everybody else lmao. I’m no yank so dont mind me but dont whine about “foreign agent” after spamming the whole internet with their bullcrap. US election news are massively upvoted and if it’s not bots I dont know what is.
You constantly try to defend Stein and 3rd party voting. YOU posted the same exact article, remember, you linked to it. So I was giving you a chance to respond to the article on here that had traction vs your post that had zero. You didn’t, so that’s all I need to know.
What is there to respond to? I didn’t write the article. There is no rule that we have to “respond” to articles that we post or don’t post.
This article reported some political news. This is a political news community. So people post political news articles.
Not sure what sort of “gotcha” moment you are looking for here. Are you trying to imply that just because some racist wacko inserted himself into the news and said that he supports Jill Stein, that it has anything to do with me?! What are you looking for? I don’t understand.
They’re ecstatic to be on the same team as Duke, but as usual everything they say is meaningless bullshit with about the same value as a 10 second long wet fart
Hmm… I wonder why a certain user who’s been posting non-stop about third-party candidates for the entire lifespan of their account chose to ignore this particular article. One would assume it’s important for the voting public to know about this, no?
Because it’s already been posted here and this sub doesn’t allow duplicate posts. I don’t know what user you’re referring to, but I’ve commented in this thread.
And I posted another article referring to David Duke and Jill Stein. https://lemmy.world/post/20893592
I thought it was interesting, so I posted it. Thank you! :)
Ah so you were late to /c/politics. Well I suppose we all have busy days at work sometimes. You’ll get ‘em next time champ.
Wait, I thought Lemmy was under the impression that I post every 17 minutes, 24 hours a day?! And that I’m a team of people. Oh AND that I’m a bot.
So if all that’s true, how was I having a “busy” day at work?!
Look at you deflecting.
You average a submission every seventeen minutes and thirty-eight seconds and that’s public information.
I do crack.
Typical non-American crack head.
I feel pity at your existence 🤷
Of course you do you’re a nazi lmao. You feel pain for me because you think of yourself as a superior race.
Your mummy called. She apologized for your existence and will come to you to put you whole back up her fat vagina.
If multiple people are guessing that you’re a bot or a paid propagandist you may see that as a sign you’re terminally online and should go explore the real world for a bit.
Maybe you could develop a sense of personality and lose the burden of supporting a failed style of governance
🤷 Idk, I’m not your dad.
If multiple people are calling me a paid propagandist I assume they are brainwashed idiots and I double-down.
You know, they cannot stand what I have to say so they have to resort to slander. They are just shitty people lmao. I like to imagine how stupid their life must be. How do they wake up, go to their job, check their blood tainted 401k, kiss their wife, all of that knowing in the depht of their being that their are selfish scumbags. It’s kinda sad really.
Woah hey now all I said was you probably had a busy day at work. A little weird to bring up bots and teams of bad actors dude, chill.
People have said that about me. So I’m just wondering how all of those diverse viewpoints can be correct if I am at work and having a busy day.
I don’t recall having brought any of that up? At any rate, it seems like whatever your occupation is, it’s pretty stressful. That sucks.
I didn’t say, nor did I imply, that you brought it up. I mentioned that many on Lemmy say that about me.
My job isn’t stressful at all. Thanks, friend! :)
No, “Lemmy” isn’t under that “impression”. Are you trying to say your profile page is wrong, or that math is?
Who are you referring to? I’m debating some “Harris needs to earn my vote. So it’s her fault if Trump wins.” idiots right now.
Unfortunately if I name this person there’s a good likelihood this discussion gets removed since the rules prohibit calling out bad faith actors, even the painstakingly obvious ones. So I’ll leave you with this: you needn’t look far to find that which you seek.
It’s @UniversalMonk@lemmy.world. It’s always @UniversalMonk@lemmy.world, and it’s so unbearably obvious that they should’ve been banned long, long ago because all they do is pollute this community with Russian propaganda. I don’t honestly care at this point if they are or are not literally paid (their post/comment frequency is staggering if they aren’t); it’s nevertheless the effect they have. This community is objectively a worse place with them here.
You think that articles from Newsweek, AP News, The Hill, USA Today, and Reuters are “Russian propaganda”?! Really?!
Absolutely no one likes you. Go away.
Well, if no one likes me, then shouldn’t be a problem for me to post here. And you can always block me too. Thanks! :)
You’re making .ml look sane.
Keep up the good work 🤡
I don’t have to explain anything to you ;)
I didn’t ask you to explain anything. Thanks! :)
My life got much better after I blocked that account a few weeks ago
Maybe a play on “omnipresent zealot”
I’ve had a tag on the user I think you’re referencing for a minute now. It’s quite helpful.
Hmm. I can think of someone who was recently accused of running two accounts. Something like bad mythical figure name.
Who got accused of running two accounts?
UniversalMonk
Who is it?
🤔
That person needs to up their numbers. Those are rookie stats!
It’s almost like people argue in bad faith on the internet. Fancy that!
Omg 😱 you might be onto something!
Or some people just don’t agree with the echo chamber. Just because the don’t change their minds and vote differently than others, doesn’t mean it’s in bad faith. Thanks! :)
They would accuse anyone of being a foreign agent lmao. That’s what you say when you want to discredit a view point. You accuse them of being moscow agents.
It’s cointelpro all over again. They want to silence pro-palestinians views because they know they belongs in jail for supporting genocide. So they call everybody else russian.
Beside, these idiots are the one imposing their news to everybody else lmao. I’m no yank so dont mind me but dont whine about “foreign agent” after spamming the whole internet with their bullcrap. US election news are massively upvoted and if it’s not bots I dont know what is.
Great points. Thank you, friend! :)
Stay safe <3 Hail satan and your multiple wives I guess.
True, some people agree with former KGB agents.
I don’t know about you, but I’m saving this post for future citations.
Solid plan.
and be sure to save this too:
Stein’s campaign says it wants nothing to do with Duke, the former American Nazi Party member
Stein’s campaign manager, Jason Call, disavowed the endorsement and called Duke “trash.”
how does this article impact anyone’s support for a 3rd party?
Here, I’ll channel my energy into a representative comment so you don’t feel left out.
“I’m not voting for her. You’re free to vote for whoever you want.”
“I didn’t write the article.”
<insert 40 paragraph spiel about fairness and lemmy always attacking them boo hoo>
Spot on
https://lemmy.world/comment/12909326
You forgot to call me “friend” and channel punchable face energy with one of these 🤗 but I’ll give you an A for effort.
Right?! Thanks, friend! :)
Here’s your chance. Defend the article.
Dude, I didn’t even post the article. Maybe you can ask the person who did? Did you even look at the name of the poster?!
Looks like I’m 2 for 2 already
Bingo!
You constantly try to defend Stein and 3rd party voting. YOU posted the same exact article, remember, you linked to it. So I was giving you a chance to respond to the article on here that had traction vs your post that had zero. You didn’t, so that’s all I need to know.
What is there to respond to? I didn’t write the article. There is no rule that we have to “respond” to articles that we post or don’t post.
This article reported some political news. This is a political news community. So people post political news articles.
Not sure what sort of “gotcha” moment you are looking for here. Are you trying to imply that just because some racist wacko inserted himself into the news and said that he supports Jill Stein, that it has anything to do with me?! What are you looking for? I don’t understand.
They’re ecstatic to be on the same team as Duke, but as usual everything they say is meaningless bullshit with about the same value as a 10 second long wet fart
As funny as it is, I think really that is where it can stop. Someone abhorrent said they support someone, that person said, no. No means no.
And yet Duke agrees with her goals. Totally meaningless /s