Finding out who he’s planning on damaging is important. But an article that starts with “Trump says…” is already too conciliatory.
Every article reporting Trump’s insanity should be written appropriately: “In full damage-control mode Trump tries to pretend his name may have been planted in Epstein files.”
“Trump violates the constitution again, in claim that…”
“Despite ruling from superior court judge, Trump pushes ahead with illegal kidnappings.”
This is what the media needs to do, and every time they don’t, it’s a failure that doesn’t deserve our attention.
Any article that begins with “Trump says” isn’t worth reading.
Unfortunately, it is. Gotta find out who Trump is trying to fuck or kill so that we can make big enough of a stink to protect them.
I get your point, but, no.
Finding out who he’s planning on damaging is important. But an article that starts with “Trump says…” is already too conciliatory.
Every article reporting Trump’s insanity should be written appropriately: “In full damage-control mode Trump tries to pretend his name may have been planted in Epstein files.”
“Trump violates the constitution again, in claim that…”
“Despite ruling from superior court judge, Trump pushes ahead with illegal kidnappings.”
This is what the media needs to do, and every time they don’t, it’s a failure that doesn’t deserve our attention.