• Australis13@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was already dubious about upgrading from 10 to 11 and this is final straw. I will have to look at Linux options and see if my Windows-only programs will run effectively under WINE.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      you should also have a look at alternatives as well.

      Especially if you do any kind of productivity work. Like video editing or photo editing. Photoshop and premiere are just absolute garbage, even if it requires you relearning an interface, not being pestered with creative cloud is a massive advantage.

      Oh and not having to pay for colors. That one is also pretty funny.

      • Australis13@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Turns out one of the video-editing programs I use (VideoRedo) has shut down anyway (I think the owner passed away) and so I’ll need to look for an alternative anyway - I don’t think I can activate it on new machines anymore.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          there are certainly a few options. I’ve been using flowblade as of late, seems to explode saving projects when you update to a new version, and use an old project, for some reason. Other than that it’s been perfectly fine.

          I hear people like kdenlive, idk, it seems alright. There’s also the free tier of davinci resolve. And im sure a few others.

    • elshandra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they’re games, protondb (.com) will tell you how well you can expect them to run. Other stuff, it’s often a case of search the web or try and see. Wine takes some getting used to, you’ll probably have to get your hands dirty and do a little learning.

      • Australis13@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good to know. I don’t play many games, but do have some older ones from GoG that would be nice to keep.

        • elshandra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Probably a good starting place would be to take the three apps you need most, and just search the web for guides to running them on Linux. That’ll give you an indication of how much work you might/not be in for.

          e: also if a guide says “just run this shell script” even chance it’s not just that simple.

    • shalva97@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In the article all apps mentioned are very old versions. I just don’t understand, how exactly this was a final straw for you?

    • sab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sure you’re aware of it already, but WineHQ provides a good overview over which software runs well under WINE. :)

    • chingadera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m fucking out. I do a lot of basic IT work, including many fresh installs and new domain users, and I am so godamn sick of having to go through 5 dialogues every single time I open edge. For the local account. Then the domain admin account. Then the domain user account. Fuck this company.

      As soon as I can afford to get an AMD GPU or do a swap with someone for my 1070, I’m gone. I used to love computers, but dealing with windows even on a home PC with no “problems”, it just feels like more work.

        • keyez@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m going AMD next as well, pop wouldn’t run games on my 3080, finally got some running on endeavourOS currently but pop and fedora had lots of issues.

          • zod000@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            PopOS has been running games fine on my 3070 for many years at this point. It might be worth another try.

            • keyez@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I just tried in February but could be because of the protocol either Wayland or X11, I run 2 1440p 144hz monitors and I think Wayland struggles with that. Have had better luck with arch and KDE x11

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can do it with an Nvidia GPU too, you don’t have to switch cards. I’m not sure where this idea comes from, that Nvidia doesn’t work on Linux, 50-60% of users are on Nvidia according to Steam.

        • Whayle@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s because out of the box there’s often issues. For example, my setup with a 3080 booted to a black screen at login. Only futzing in the command prompt via grub let me install the correct driver, and it’s been fine ever since then.

          • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            All drivers have to deal with fbdev and EFI DRM shenanigans and there’s no simple solution (if you insist on hiding boot messages behind pretty graphics, or having a graphical console, which most distros do unfortunately, God forbid you should kernel and system messages for 3 seconds).

            Until the ancient fbdev stuff will finally be completely obsolete it’s all about compromise. Most often the distro will have a working default, in some corner cases it will backfire. Personally I set my console to text only so I don’t have to deal with any of this.

            TLDR it can happen, and not necessarily on Nvidia.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        oh for what it’s worth. I’ve been using my 1070 under arch with nvidia drivers for years now. It’s problematic sometimes, and configuration is a mess. But it generally works perfectly fine.

        It’ll work more than well enough just to test the waters in linux though.

        although, to be clear, i am still on X, i hear it’s worse on wayland. But I’d say X is worthwhile if you’re savvy enough. It’s an interesting piece of software history. (and it rarely updates)

        • chingadera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          This seems promising, do you have any resources I can check out to accomplish the switch? I’ve used some Linux, mostly Debian, so really don’t think it would be all that tough to go through.

      • Landless2029@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can disable or streamline that stuff with either group policy or registry keys.

        I used to do the same work (several years ago) and I started researching fixes and writing scripts to speed up my work.

        Make a to do list of what your computer setup process is. Figure out the earliest you can launch a script (netshare or usb). Then start writing scripts for your tasks.

        Installing apps, file transfers and system configs.

        • chingadera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unfortunately our setup is not that sophisticated and neither am I. It’s a goal we’re working toward, but we’re just caught in a loop doing archaic shit because the workload is too high to fix it.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That seems like a lot of convoluted bullshit just to get your os to work, considering you need to update the whole thing every week.

          You sure you haven’t tried arch? Openbsd? You sound like a typical user.

          • Landless2029@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m talking about supporting an American enterprise environment that handles medical patient data. No Linux workstations really. Easier to comply with HIPAA that way.

            Is it convoluted BS? Sure why not. But Microsoft services are really sticky once you get integrated at a large scale (5k workstations plus over 100 servers).

    • NixDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      ConisioAdmin.exe (Solidworks PDM)
      
      EaseUS Disk Copy.exe (EaseUS Disk Copy Application)
      
      ep_dwm.exe (ExplorerPatcher) Included since 22H2
      
      iCloudServices.exe (iCloud files shared in Explorer via WhatsApp) from 23H2
      
      RadeonSoftware.exe (AMD GPU perf settings) from23H2
      
      StartAllBackCfg.exe (StartAllBack) Included since 22H2
      
      Multi-mon + Copilot (Microsoft)
      
      MergeSdb (Microsoft)
      
      Intel IntcOED.sys (Intel)
      
      Intel IntcAudioBus.sys (Intel) (%WinDir%\System32\drivers\IntcAudioBus.sys)
      
      Realtek 8192su Wireless USB 2.0 Adapter (Realtek) (%WinDir%\System32\drivers\RTL8192su.sys)
      
  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wouldn’t it be nice if you could just keep using Windows 10 forever, and get security updates for free?

    • EarMaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      For reference: Debian 6 which was the current release of Debian at the time Windows 10 was released hasn’t received official security patches 2016, CentOS 6.6 stopped receiving them 2022. Mac OS X Yosemite latest update was released 2017…

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        the cool thing about debian though, you can just reinstall that shit. Or if you like flying close to the sun. Just change your apt sources. And hope nothing explodes.

        • Miaou@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          My vps was two Debian versions late and both upgrade went super smooth. Did it fromy damn phone even.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            i imagine it’s a bit of gamble sometimes, depends on how much software was deprecated changed or moved around, a lot can happen in a support period. Regardless spinning up a new install in an automated manner should be relatively trivial, and probably something anyone can accomplish for backup purposes.

      • Krzd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah and? Debian is free, you can just upgrade to the newer version without paying a thing.

          • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, actually, extra ads begging me to subscribe to my own computer are a cost.

          • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I cannot use my win11 laptop because they removed the language bar and switching keyboard layout is impossible. Unfortunately it’s something that I do on the regular since programming in my native layout is really difficult hunting down alt+some numbers for the {} and I need letters with accents like žšć when I write something

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          And upgrades tend to be pretty stable. You can still use whatever UX you were used to before, since packages tend to stick around quite a bit.

          The issue with Win 11 is that it drastically changes hardware requirements and UX. That’s not an issue for Debian.

          • x0x7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            And because linux is 99% just the programs you install on it when you do upgrade to a new version you aren’t being forced into a new system. This is why distro wars are pointless.

      • cilmor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Windows 10 was released on July 29, 2015, Debian 8 was released on 26 April 2015, 3 months earlier. And you are comparing it with Debian 6, released 4 years earlier? Debian 8 extended long term support reaches end-of-life 30 June 2025.

        • EarMaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are right. I misinterpreted the information on wiki page. Debian 8’s free LTS tier ended 2020 and the Extended LTS continues until 2025. Extended support is a paid service though and costs a lot more than a single Windows license. Microsoft offers a similar (also paid) service.

      • ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s comparing apples to oranges, that said, the current version of Debian is much closer to the UX of Debian 6 than windows 11 is to windows 10

        If the point of windows is you’re paying for an operating system and should then have better support than a free alternative, they should be able to push security updates, especially if they’re already committed to ensuring old windows app can still run inside new windows

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mac OS is Apple to oranges against windows when it comes to OS support?

          Conveniently skipped that part and focused on Debian…

          • ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No, it’s not apples to oranges because Mac and windows are both paid support.

            If you want to compare apples to apples, then sure, Mac is better than windows. That’s a low bar to beat though. I was comparing apples to oranges, which was a comparison in paid vs free support.

            But yes, macs desktop environment and user experience hasn’t taken half as much of a dump as windows. But they’re also based on Linux, and don’t have to make the same commitments windows does

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              macOS is not based on Linux, it’s based on FreeBSD (and other BSD) userspace and the Mach kernel. AFAIK, there isn’t any Linux code there.

        • EarMaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          They did provide security updates for several years longer than any competitor. Even (or especially depending on your point of view) for a company like Microsoft a user shouldn’t expect updates indefinitely at least not for the normal retail price.

          And to be clear: I also don’t want to blame any of the named Linux distros. I recently migrated an old CentOS 6 server and it was about time. Sure there were still some security updates but several software components hadn’t received updates for years and there were a lot of workarounds necessary to keep the thing in a somewhat decent and modern state.

      • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        windows 10 was meant to be the last version of windows, its a bit disingenuous to compare the two that way

        • jose1324@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ughh i hate reading this hoax. W10 was never the last version of windows. It’s a paraphrased report of one engineer at Microsoft that said that, but it was never in any official capacity confirmed

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The Verge asked a rep at Microsoft, and this is what they said:

            When I reached out to Microsoft about Nixon’s comments, the company didn’t dismiss them at all. “Recent comments at Ignite about Windows 10 are reflective of the way Windows will be delivered as a service bringing new innovations and updates in an ongoing manner, with continuous value for our consumer and business customers,” says a Microsoft spokesperson in a statement to The Verge. “We aren’t speaking to future branding at this time, but customers can be confident Windows 10 will remain up-to-date and power a variety of devices from PCs to phones to Surface Hub to HoloLens and Xbox. We look forward to a long future of Windows innovations.”

            So they didn’t rule out branding changes, but the changes to Win 11 seem like a pretty big change from Win 10, which seems to go against the “Windows will be delivered as a service” statement. So it’s not just that one engineer, but probably a broader push (that may have been delayed or scrapped) to push gradual updates consistently instead of larger, periodic updates. I’m no expert, but I didn’t really see much difference in how Win 10 was released vs previous versions (e.g. XP, 7, and 10 all had service packs).

          • avatar@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wasn’t the entire point of not using “Windows 9” branding and instead going straight to “Windows 10” from 8 that they didn’t want the last version of Windows to be 9, that they preferred a nice round number.

            • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              No. The point was they didn’t want issues from badly written software that used a “windows 9*” string to check for 95/98

          • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            well the way they stopped making new windows versions after 10 (until now) seems to indicate that was the plan

  • Otter@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Full list from this comment on another thread: https://lemmy.ca/comment/8470544

    ConisioAdmin.exe (Solidworks PDM)

    EaseUS Disk Copy.exe (EaseUS Disk Copy Application)

    ep_dwm.exe (ExplorerPatcher) Included since 22H2

    iCloudServices.exe (iCloud files shared in Explorer via WhatsApp) from 23H2

    RadeonSoftware.exe (AMD GPU perf settings) from23H2

    StartAllBackCfg.exe (StartAllBack) Included since 22H2

    Multi-mon + Copilot (Microsoft)

    MergeSdb (Microsoft)

    Intel IntcOED.sys (Intel)

    Intel IntcAudioBus.sys (Intel) (%WinDir%\System32\drivers\IntcAudioBus.sys)

    Realtek 8192su Wireless USB 2.0 Adapter (Realtek) (%WinDir%\System32\drivers\RTL8192su.sys)

    • style99@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was already bad enough that we’re stuck trying to use a trash OS to run our games and soul-sucking corporate crap, but now we have to ditch our customization tools to get updates that we need?

      Thank goodness I mostly just use Linux.

  • XenGi@lemmy.chaos.berlin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why are people still using Windows? Seems to me that the pain to use it is still not big enough. I welcome every move that increases the pain and drives people to better options.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        As I tell everyone who comes up with this kind of takes. This is not Linux’s fault or responsibility. This is the specific app developer’s fault.

        No one screams at Google because iMessage doesn’t run on Android, that would be madness. For every software package or app that doesn’t run on Linux, there’s usually several dozen alternatives that do. If you don’t like them and want to stick with the ones you like and also try to use Linux? the move is to call out the app developers. Tell them that you want Linux support, a Linux build and to please work on that.

        There’s zero, absolutely nothing, nothing at all, that the developers of a OS kernel, or the maintainers of a distribution can do to force other’s app to support the OS they work on.

        The most we can do is offer compatibility layers like Wine that can run some Windows only software. And they can go pretty far, like Proton, which can run most games. But still there’s only so much these can do. The tooling, build libraries, compilation chain, everything that exist to make an app for Windows has its counterparts for Linux. It usually only takes a couple of afternoons tinkering with config files to get a project to compile for Linux. With almost no change to the code base itself. The community usually does the bulk of the distribution part, making Flatpaks, or setting up the package for the repositories. Even then, making a RPM or DEB file is also a no-brainer. So, if your favorite app doesn’t exist in Linux, it is because the developer either made the conscious decision of not supporting, or no one has ever told them that they want one, so they haven’t considered it. Sometimes they deliberately make their app impossible to function on Linux, it happens, they have explicit code in their software that detects things like Wine to sabotage the OS.

        The move is to write to your favorite app’s developers, complaining on social media does nothing, we literally can’t do anything for you.

        • Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Obviously. I’m just pointing out the issues with those kind of smoothbrained, “everyone should use Linux because I said so and the whole world is black and white”, kind of takes I see all the time on this site.

        • ElusiveClarity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is no substitute for Revit on Linux. Autodesk won’t even bring it to MacOS, which is what many architects prefer. People have been asking them for years to develop for other operating systems and they don’t give a shit. The person you responded to wasn’t blaming anyone for autodesk not supporting Linux. They were answering the question of why they still use it. I use Revit every day for work and I would wipe windows from my work pc in a second if there were an alternative. I’m working on a $300m project right now where it specifically states in the contract that we must use Revit so until autodesk decides to support it or goes fully browser based, we are screwed.

          • XenGi@lemmy.chaos.berlin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That still doesn’t stop you from using Linux or macos on your private devices. I’m also forced to use awful software at work but that’s I call a fraction of my salary pain money (Schmerzensgeld). That’s fine. If it is enough I’m willing to deal with Microsoft, Autodesk and the like. But in my personal life. I have the choice and I would never use it if I don’t like it.

          • NedPool@eviltoast.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            This, 100%. Autodesk has full industries by the balls and just laughing their way to the bank.

            Zero fucks for their user base and bloated buggy software. We would ditch them in an instant if AutoCAD wasn’t required for prints.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You can still dual boot or use virtual machines in your private devices. It’s the usual workaround for people who are forced to use one particular incompatible app. That fact is literally not what’s stopping you from using Linux. It’s only stopping from using Revit on Linux, but again, that’s not on Linux, there’s nothing any of us can do, take your grievances with Autodesk. This fact doesn’t forbids you nor does it prevent you from using Linux for everything else.

    • NedPool@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My job includes programming devices from manufacturers that only write their software for Windows. There are entire industries that are blind to anything but Windows due to lock-in from one or more manufacturers of devices needed for daily operations.

      Some consumer products are similarly locked-in due to supporting software. There may be alternatives for common tools, but device-specific things simply won’t work on Linux, 90% of the time. Sure, we can request the manufacturer support Linux in some way, but good luck getting any response let alone a working port.

      Edit: Yes, it may be becoming more painful to use Windows, but until it’s less painful to take the Linux path for viable alternatives, nothing will change.

      • XenGi@lemmy.chaos.berlin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Linux or macos path, if there is one is always less painful.

        If there isn’t one, if the a manufacturer doesn’t support other os’ then you should demand this support from them. They will only listen to money. So take your money to an alternative or offer money for the support.

        The point is that it’s not Linux’ fault that program x is not natively supported on Linux. It’s the programs fault and partly yours/your employers for choosing it.

        • desconectado@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No one has said it’s Linux’s fault… But unfortunately it’s still an issue Linux users have to deal with.

          Also, not everyone is the CTO of their company to demand other suppliers. Most people are stuck with company policy that they have absolutely no say in it. Companies are not democracies.

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t you disable SmartSense or whatever bullshit there is that scans apps programs when they’re installed?

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably but they certainly don’t want you to know that and almost certainly will say that you can’t.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I assume because said apps and drivers break if the OS is updated.

    • Jake [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it is anything like Linux, those drivers are likely unsigned by the packager and they are a vulnerability for secure boot and your UEFI bootloader.

      Like if someone did the same type of attack as the XZ compression utility in Linux recently; where a benign looking file is modified and another is equally altered within the package so that the total file size does not change. That kind of attack is not possible with a signed kernel module/driver.

      That is the only thing I can think of that would tie all of these elements together. They could all be accessing something in kernel space using an unsigned driver.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That kind of attack is not possible with a signed kernel module/driver.

        How is using a compromised userspace library not possible with a signed kernel module?

        That aside, if the events would unfold similarly, the software requiring to be signed would be, in fact, signed.

        An awfully stupid comment TBF. As if you desperately tried to defend MS. EDIT: Sorry, that was just my irritation.

  • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This stops Windows 11 from blocking the installation and lets you get the app back onto your PC. We’re not sure if Microsoft has fixed this trick, but it’s worth a shot if you want to keep using your favorite apps.

    That’s mildly distopian.

    This prevents your car from shutting itself off when trying visit certain areas on the map. We’re not sure if car manufacturers have fixed this trick, but it’s worth a shot if you want to keep going to your favorite places.

    And only a little tiny bit adversarial.

    • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is what ive been saying about windows vs Linux for years.

      Windows is PvP, and now I’m seeing fucking Hangul characters in chat, and I’m afraid. I don’t even use it anymore.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Lol. :)

            My wife is Korean and I noped out of playing StarCraft when I visited her family. I also worked with a “minor-league” StarCraft player (played on Euro servers with a team) and a regular Korean guy, and it was always close when we’d do lan games at work afterhours (us normies would die off early and watch as those two duked it out).

            So yeah, I get it. Koreans are hardcore…

  • JakenVeina@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So, wait, Mocrosoft is finally giving us a way to fully-disable automatic Windows Updates?

    /s

  • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Glad they have time to call out everyone else’s problems, yet Microsoft still can’t fix their broken jan win 10 update.

    • AlphaOmega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is that the one where MS updated the recovery partition by including a file that’s too big for that default partition? I had to manually resize my recovery partition to fix that issue

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      don’t worry, microsoft never figured out how to write bootloader installation software.

      It can not only, install itself onto a slower, hdd, but also completely wipe any additional drives you have hooked up at the time of installation.

      The fact that this STILL isn’t fixed is baffling to me.

      • exu@feditown.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is this still an issue with UEFI nowadays? The other bootloader should still be selectable in the bootmenu if it wasn’t overwritten.