• Laurel Raven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I’d rather have my back panel fingerprint reader back than an even thinner phone, and then there’s the pointlessness of making the phone so thin that to have a remotely decent camera they have to add a huge bulge. Just… Make the whole damned thing that thick and use the extra space for, I dunno, more battery maybe?

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not going to buy any of those, and I don’t use a smartwatch at all, but I’d rather have a thicker laptop and phone with the extra space expended on a larger battery.

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I want more functionality and better battery life. And guess what, thinner doesn’t help with any of those.

    • dukk@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Make the phone half as thick, then double the battery and fill the rest with thermals.

      Apple: Yes, yes, this innovation constitutes a $600 price increase.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The 13” iPad Pro M4 is thinner than the iPod Nano, making it the thinnest device Apple has ever made (except for the camera bump, but we don’t talk about that). It’s wild how thin it is, but it’s significantly lighter than its predecessor and is much nicer to hold.

      But it can be that thin because it’s large enough that the battery can be spread out. I wouldn’t want a phone that thin.

  • ben@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like we’re just going backwards, we stopped caring about tech getting thin enough to act like a blade like a decade ago.

    Why are we doing this again?

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    They scored big with the M-series macbook being a little thicker and having an hdmi port, and now they want to go back?

    • astrsk@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly… in my opinion hdmi needs to die. DisplayPort is superior in every way, especially when driving from thunderbolt/usb4. We are so close to one port for everything, even if we have to continue dongle hell for a while longer.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s no way that the home entertainment world is gonna drop HDMI.

        It may be technically-inferior, but HDMI support means that your computer can talk to home entertainment displays like televisions and home entertainment projectors, not just computer displays.

  • A Phlaming Phoenix@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t want thinner. I want more functionality. Don’t expect me to pay 2 grand for a laptop with no external USB or HDMI ports, for which privileges I can pay an additional $100 or so. I’m frustrated enough by the lack of Ethernet jacks on my Lenovo. The last time I had a Mac (work shipped me one), I was even more frustrated by how bad the built in trackpad and keyboard were and the fact that using an external device to replace them came at a premium price.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t expect me to pay 2 grand for a laptop with no external USB or HDMI ports

      HDMI is a trash standard and we should move everyone to Displayport at a minimum, or Thunderbolt. But also, all the MacBook Pros have HDMI.

      I was even more frustrated by how bad the built in trackpad

      Weird. I think Apple’s trackpad is head and shoulders better than anyone else’s.

  • disconnectikacio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    another crappy apple invented useless fashion, that will be spread everywhere, as everyone wants to follow the trends. See: curved display, micro SIM then nano SIM, no headphone jack, etc.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why? Phones have been thin enough for a long time that you have to put them in a case just to get a good grip.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I want an iPhone with a larger battery so it doesn’t have the stupid camera bulge.

      Longer life and doesn’t rock when I text on a surface.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Actually, they’ve been getting thicker every year since the 6, believe it or not.

      • DolphinMath@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d be happier if they push for lighter devices personally. Glass feels nice, but their Pro models can be obnoxiously heavy.

      • slaacaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. I’m still on my 11pro for this reason, already had to replace the battery. I got the 15 as a work phone, it feels very large in comparison, I’m not a fan.