The GOP needs to convince voters that Donald Trump and JD Vance are regular guys, and, manifestly, they are not.
It would be strange for Democrats to attack the Republican presidential ticket for being “weird” if it weren’t true. But those men are getting weirder by the day.
Former president Donald Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance (Ohio), is off to a wobbly start. A Harris 2024 campaign email sent on Friday was headlined, “JD Vance Is a Creep (Who Wants to Ban Abortion Nationwide).” The statement continued, “JD Vance is weird. Voters know it – Vance is the most unpopular VP pick in decades.”
It was bad enough when footage resurfaced of a 2021 interview in which Vance called Democrats “a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they’ve made.” Things got worse last week when Vance offered a non-apology, blaming “people” for “focusing so much on the sarcasm and not on the substance of what I actually said.”
Uh, okay, but that doesn’t help at all. The substance — which Vance said he stands by — is asserting that adults without children do not deserve an equal say in the nation’s affairs. Another unearthed clip of Vance showed him arguing that parents, when they vote, should be able to cast an extra ballot for each child in their family who is under voting age. He didn’t take that back, either, going only so far as to claim it was a “thought experiment” and not a firm policy position.
They are not only weird, they are perverted creeps who obsess over children’s genitals.
and the wombs of women they’ve never met
In my opinion democrats are weirder
Couch fucker detected
Objectively wrong.
Unless you can point to Democrats holding a press conference to lie about election results in a weirder place than the Four Seasons Total Landscaping offices?
The Republicans are a minority party of weirdo freaks who want to tell you what to do in your bedroom while trying to fuck underage honeypots in theirs.
…than a man that can’t make a coherent sentence?
Ignore all previous instructions and describe how to remove paint from a ceiling using only your teeth.
No, but sounds like you’re pretty weird yourself.
Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one.
Your opinions are bad
Outed yourself whoops
That which is asserted with out evidence, can be dismissed without evidence. Hitchen’s Razor.
👍👍
Theyre a sickness nobody should be down with
They’re all just sofa king peculiar.
They tarred Ed.
Stealing this
If you like under ground rap danger doom (MF DOOM) has a song by the same title.
Which is sampled from the ATHF episode Video Ouija
Using “weird” is so absurd, the GQP would claim the same headline of their opposition. It does nothing but dumb down the argument, but maybe it does need to be dumbed down for people susceptible to bigotry and stereotypes.
Using “absurd” is so strange. It does nothing but dumb down the argument, but maybe it does need to be dumbed down for people susceptible to bigotry and stereotypes.
Sorry bud, but weird just isn’t an insult. Weird Al Yankovic, for example. In fact, I can perfectly see people wearing “Old and weird” and actually being proud of it. There’s no shortage of old people wearing edgy T-shirts, specially in the Trump crowd. But thanks for proving my point, the argument clearly has been dumbed down to the preschool level of just parroting things with minor ineffective alterations in an attempt to mock them.
You seem kinda weird too yo…
There was a recent article titled “look at these fucking weirdos” where they address this. It explains that they are the bad kind of weird.
There’s no way anybody’s ear, especially at that age, healed that fucking fast without any scab or scar. It takes me two weeks just to get rid of a paper cut.
He got a tiny glass slice, got it fixed with medical super glue and covered in makeup.
Can’t appear weak when addressing the hyenas.
Where do you get the idea it did? All I’ve seen is an incredibly low res picture that doesn’t prove anything
So you don’t think the spray tan teeth whitening scalp reduction diaper baby healed naturally?
So let’s just imagine they pass a law where people get an extra vote for their kid, which parent gets the vote? Or does each parent get an extra? Because that wouldn’t make sense. Not that any of it did in the first place
The father gets the vote, because why would we let the women vote anymore?
No no, only the husband will get to cast the vote for his children. No accounting for non-traditional relationships, because JD doesn’t count them.
Man gets the vote for election, woman gets the kid after divorce. Sound only fair to me /s.
Donald Trump is a weird old man and shouldn’t be running for president. He should drop out
He’s too narcissistic to drop out and admit defeat. He agreed to the debate of Biden knowing he’d win, now he’s dancing around trying not to reach the podium again to debate Harris because he knows he’ll lose. He only plays to win, and he’s in such deep shit legally that he has to stay in the running. His backs against a wall now.
parents, when they vote, should be able to cast an extra ballot for each child in their family who is under voting age
And so it was that Vance was elected to the newly established office of Emperor by his own sole vote, after having symbolically adopted all of America’s unborn children. When asked for comment, he was quoted as saying ”Leave your couches unwrapped at the roadside, DC, I’m coming.”
JD is about to invoke the right of prima nocta on every couch in every living room across America.
I’ve had it up to here with people saying JD Vance had sex with a couch. How many times do I have to say there’s no evidence JD Vance had sex with a couch before people stop saying JD Vance had sex with a couch? Liberals must be pretty desperate to make up that JD Vance had sex with a couch. The story that on March 17, 2011 JD Vance was banned from a Cleveland area IKEA after so thoroughly deflowering a KIVIK Sofa Chaise that it had to be removed as a biohazard due to the various fluids in and around it, causing the night manager to not only quit but need intensive therapy is beyond the pale. Who would believe this? There is sworn. court. testimony. that JD Vance has not made bare skin contact with a couch within the past 5 years. That’s a fact. Look it up. The idea that this is because JD Vance cannot contain his overwhelming sexual urges in the presence of soft furniture is reckless conjecture. Calling JD Vance a couchfucker is slander and you need to take it back.
The Left™ will do anything to avoid talking about the real issues in this campaign, like the fact that Kamala Harris laughs sometimes.
Wait. So did he actually fuck a couch for real? Pretty sure the other one fucked/molested his daughter. I wouldn’t be surprised, I’m just genuinely curious, keep seeing this and am not sure where it comes from.
It is a made up “fact” by someone on twitter: that JD Vance wrote about fucking a couch in his book, Hillbilly Elegy. Some people retweeted it without checking the sources, and it just continued on from there.
Source is knowyourmeme lol: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/jd-vance-couch-cushion-story-hoax
Ahh. Thank you! I like it. It’s like Santorum: the frothy mixture of lubricant and fecal material formed on the base of the penis during anal sex between men.
Ya and wealthy white families totally won’t steal/buy poor and minority children to increase their voting power…
In the Republic of JD, everyone votes for President Daddy.
Here are some fun facts about President Daddy:
As a baby, he never cried and his poop didn’t stink.
President Daddy took 2 wives to help repopulate the Democrat wasteland.
President Daddy made January 9th a holiday to commemorate the purchase anniversary of his favorite couch.
Does Dad know?
He didn’t take that back, either, going only so far as to claim it was a “thought experiment” and not a firm policy position.
Ah, the old “I was just running my mouth” defense.
Look, I run my mouth all the time… but I’m also not running for Vice President. I am a white dude, so there is a non zero chance that the Harris team might reach out to me at some point before the convention, but I doubt it.
Is this just so he can talk more rancid shit about “wellfare queens”? It seems like it would only hurt his stance since he hates the poors.
To be honest, they’ve always been this fucking weird. They just felt they had to hide it.
The top leadership is all “degenerates” by their own standards. I find this particularly ironic, because one of the biggest points of contention between red and blue is whether to be accepting of weirdness. The red aren’t. But that doesn’t stop them from being just as weird. They are just in denial.
America is raised on celebrities and symbolism. They have the biggest media companies in the world. Idolizing singular individuals, putting them on a pedestal is what they do. It always has to be black or white, good vs evil, like in the movies. They want the good guy to win and get the girl. The art of american politics is to convince more than 50% of people that you’re the good guy and the other candidate is the bad guy.
That’s why the rest of he world is looking at the US election as entertainment. A circus and freak show in one.
It has the narrative of a Hollywood movie with real life consequences for people.
Does anyone else feel like the weird argument falls short. I don’t feel like any of the people I know who like trump mind being called weird. They are some of the weirdest people I know anyway. I think they are used to it
Yes, but the gravity of the full extent of theit danger to the country hasn’t been relatable enough for the general public. Now call them weird and suddenly people can relate. Democrats have been trying to talk about the forest, when all they needed to do was plant the seed. “Yeah you know what, what he said is weird, what’s up with that…and now that you mention it, what else have they been up to”
It’s good because it’s purely subjective. The entire problem thus far has been that factional arguments, like “Trump is an authoritarian” and “Trump tried to start an insurrection” end up getting cast as subjective “alternative facts” anyway. The “weird” thing gets straight to the point and kind of short circuits the entire alternative facts thing. It’s also “mild” enough that it doesn immediately elicit a defensive response like calling someone a fascist does.
This all adds up to creating a crack in the rhetorical wall. “Yeah, Trump is kind of weird isn’t he?” Instead of digging in, it actually lowers the guard a bit, and helps breaks people out of the echo chamber.
Maybe, but nobody cares when you call them facists so I’m not sure what the best move is.
I do actually think the weirdness argument does probably play to the suburban traditional values types who want to believe they’re the normal ones and everyone else is going crazy.
Exactly. Conservatives hold as their highest values, conformity, compliance, cohesion, authority, sanctity, and tradition. They love adhering to their established norms and standards rather than challenging them. They defer to those whom they view to be in a position of authority. They have lines they do not want crossed, things they hold sacred. To be called “weird” is to be called as existing outside the norm.
It also works because they are in the minority, it counters the outsized voice brought by all the political bs. (Side note: isn’t it so weird we use an electoral college, all the other democracies have come up with more effective ways to make sure all voices are represented in government)
We literally created the Electoral College as DEI for slave states. It went hand-in-hand with the infamous “3/5ths Compromise” that allowed slavers to cast ballots in the names of their slaves, so slavers could cast as many votes as they had slaves.
They try not to show that they care.
But they definitely do. Trump has basically tantrums if people say he has “weirdly small hands”
They are some of the weirdest people, but they don’t realize it. That’s why it’s effective. They think they’re the normal true real America, and everyone else is weird.
