They can’t possibly kill them all right?
“Aerospace firm” is pretty generous. They’re a defense contractor.
Why not both? Besides, I’m just quoting the article.
Boing: challenge accepted
I feel terrible for all the work boeing’s hitman is going to have to do this week 🤦🏻♂️
Those hitmen aren’t cheap, either!
Huge Uber bill, too
He’ll be clocking a lot of overtime this month.
Would be funny if Boeing started cutting corners with their hitmen, too.
Hahahh, would be hilarious to then get a whistleblower from the team of “boeing’s hitmens” because of bad working conditions
“do you know how many people I had to talk out this week?? I’m losing my head mate”
" Challenge accepted"
You’re talking them to death? That’s gotta be harder than just shooting them, my man.
Haha that was a typo but it made it fun
I meant take. Take out.
“would you get shot by Boeing…?”
“me personally? no. not really.”
10 more whistleblowers
My condolences to their family in these trying times.
My condolences to their family in these trying times.
My condolences to their family in these trying times.
My condolences to their family in these trying times.
My condolences to their family in these trying times.
My condolences to their family in these trying times.
My condolences to their family in these trying times.
My condolences to their family in these trying times.
My condolences to their family in these trying times.
My condolences to their family in these trying times.
George Carlin did talk about the 20? Senior citizens who past away in Bolivia when they all stood up on a goddamn rollercoaster. Right into the fresh Bolivian La Paz air. I thought I should mention it since free tickets to Dizne could be the first step Being used to reproduce such a catastrophic event.
Watch out you whistleblowing yous out there. Accept no free tickets for Dizne.
“A lot of holes in the desert, and a lot of problems are buried in those holes. But you gotta do it right. I mean, you gotta have the hole already dug before you show up with a package in the trunk. Otherwise, you’re talking about a half-hour to forty-five minutes worth of digging. And who knows who’s gonna come along in that time? Pretty soon, you gotta dig a few more holes. You could be there all fuckin’ night.”
I remember thinking movies just had absurd sensationalized plot lines and that our societies were past that shit. Then I saw former soviets killed by alpha particle emitting pills, whistleblowers dying, and now I’m thinking the truth is stranger than fiction.
Hang in there Edward Snowden, it’s amazing that fucker threaded the needle and still lives.
I guess now we know which camel came out on top. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8oCilY4szc
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://www.piped.video/watch?v=Q8oCilY4szc
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Boeing:
I laughed way to hard at this.
So hard you dropped an O.
No no. He was laughing on the way to hard, which is obviously a city, maybe a home-town, with no schooling system. #noChildLeftBehind
How do I so strongly recognize this but can’t recall what it’s from!!??
Hot Fuzz
It’s from a Star Wars spinoff movie: Hoth Tusk
It’s a pretty popular GIF taken from the 2007 movie Hot Fuzz.
whistleblower hunting season for boeing
People assume that Boeing is behind this. I’m more inclined to believe that it’s a major shareholder
If it’s a major owner of a company I would still say it’s the company.
“what are they going to do, kill all of us?” - dead whistleblower
Famous last words
It’ll be such a surprise when it turns out all 10 have been suicidal for years and/or extremely susceptible to infection.
They were all invited to do their depositions in some flyover state. The only way there is using flights on Boeing planes.
/joke
Labeling your joke as a joke is the dumbest thing I’ve seen in a long time. That’s even dumber than /s
I knew it’s either your comment or a bunch saying how I’m peddling bullshit. I chose to be ridiculed on style instead of substance.
I fail to see the sarcasm in your comment, as your /s indicates.
Well, you would have to be a little bit suicidal to blow the whistle on Boeing now, after seeing what happened to the last two guys…
Life insurance premiums are about to skyrocket for Boeing whistleblowers.
One decided to spontaneously hike and fell off a cliff. One was in an unfortunate drunk driving accident. One got hit by an Airbus engine. etc. etc.
Imagine them going crazy and stuffing themselves in a suite case.
One death is coincidental, two is suspicious, any more and it’s gonna become plainly obvious, and now there’s 10. That’s just delicious. They can’t silence them all.
Even one death under these circumstances is not a coincidence, and that ought to be coded into law. You’d better fucking well hope the person who blows a whistle on you is healthy - that’s the world we should move towards. Not that that couldn’t also be abused, but the pendulum is way too fucking far this way.
The first wasn’t coincidental. He said “hey they might murder me” then he died right before testifying.
Well, iirc he didn’t show for his deposition, or the day after, or the day after that, at which point the lawyers sent people to find him and found he “committed suicide”.
This is after he said “I am absolutely not going to commit suicide over this. If I die and people say it was suicide, I was killed.”
It certainly warrants investigation, but the way the second guy died is actually not particularly suspicious. He got pneumonia, then he got MRSA in a hospital. 50,000-100,000 people every year get MRSA in a hospital setting, almost always people of his demographic with pneumonia, and it is incredibly lethal. We have upwards of 10,000 deaths a year due to it. Again, almost all casualties are his demographic.
And it is suspected that thousand of elderly people are murdered every year, but it is ruled as a natural death, because the demographic is prone to natural deaths and nobody bothers to check further.
At the very least demanding a throughout investigation in both cases is absolutely reasonable.
sadfsdfasfasf
So in other words, very plausible deniability.
https://allthatsinteresting.com/heart-attack-gun
We had that tech in 1968. I’m pretty sure it would be a matter of a phone call and some change from the couch cushions for Boeing to create that outcome.
Does this mean they did it? No.
Does it warrant the reaction folks are having about it? Absolutely yes.
which could cause death in minutes without leaving a trace.
Aside from the puncture wound.
Which can be missed by an examiner
Well that’s it. Case closed. The existence of a heart attack gun in 1968 proves Boeing killed 2 whistleblowers in 2024. Good job gang.
Well that’s it. Case closed. The existence of a heart attack gun in 1968 proves Boeing killed 2 whistleblowers in 2024. Good job gang.
Literally no one has made that statement, including me, the guy who brought up the heart attack gun. Take a breath man.
Yeah I’m so worked up over here…?
He is clearly implying that the boeing thing is possible because things like this exist. Otherwise why bring it up?
From the article:
All that would be left behind was a tiny red dot where the dart entered the body, undetectable to those who didn’t know to look for it.
They may have ironed that out, this article is talking about tech that is more than half a century old. We got from first aeroplane to man on the moon in less than that.
So “it can be done” is now evidence of a grand conspiracy? What did I say that remotely indicated I didn’t think it was possible from a logistics perspective? How does showing me the existence of a heart attack gun from the 60s prove boeing murdered people? How is any of this relevant?
This is why conspiracy theories don’t die. “It’s possible that…” becomes “I could see that…” then it becomes “that happened.” All without a single shred of evidence necessary. We have wild imaginations.
Does this mean they did it? No.
Does it warrant the reaction folks are having about it? Absolutely yes. (Edit - In light of their current troubles and the fate of the prior whistleblower.)
I stand by that statement, and don’t feel like trying again to connect the dots on the relevancy of my example for you. Whatever you are arguing about is - not the same.
I have said multiple times this warrants an investigation. The issue is people here have already decided what the facts are.
Can’t or won’t?
Seriously, though, I wouldn’t be surprised, if a bunch of suicides or “retractions” are happening soon.
How about 2 million if you shut up? No? How about we publish this dirt on you? Would be a shame, if some nameless robber orphans your children.
1 dead whistleblower is a tragedy. 10 dead whistleblowers are a statistic.
nice reference 10/10
I give it a perfect 5/7
With rice?
Currently at 2/10 but they’ll get there.
2/12
2/12 so far
10/10 survive yes?
Any serious issue should have a paper trail of some sort. Emails, meetings, part rejections, that sort of thing. There are processes in place to allow anonymous reporting of some of these things.
How is your polonium tea comrade?
Planely obvious
I still don’t see why they can’t.
Article author seems to have completely fabricated the “10 more”. There are no quotes from anyone even hinting at more whistleblowers existing, let alone ten more.
Is not a source I’m familiar with. But everyone wants to believe it, so upvotes it is.
Its one of the largest Indian Newspapers
It might be, but I’ve noticed it has a very click baity style, and don’t find it to be very trustworthy.
With the way Modi is running India right now, that’s not exactly a glowing recommendation.
Yup. Every major media outlet is a sellout at this point. These days my only source of legit news comes from YouTube.
I think this is sarcasm but it could also not be
But ONLY the comments section!
You forgot the /s
In the US the most trustworthy media sources right now are Jon Stewart and John Oliver
Lmao
Probably because quoting them would be a preemptive death
good to know they killed a second one too…allegedly
