Intel’s stock dropped around 30% overnight, shaving some $39 billion from the company’s market capitalization since rumors of a pending layoff first emerged. The devastating results come after the chip giant reported a loss for the second quarter, complained about yield issues with the Meteor Lake CPU, provided a modest business outlook for the next few quarters, and announced plans to lay off 15,000 people worldwide.

When the NYSE closed on July 31, Intel’s market capitalization was $130.86 billion. Then, a report about Intel’s massive layoffs was published, and the company’s market capitalization dropped sharply to $123.96 billion on August 1. Following Intel’s financial report yesterday, the company’s capitalization dropped to $91.86 billion. Essentially, Intel has lost half of its capitalization since January. As of now, Intel’s market value is a fraction of Nvidia’s worth and less than half of AMD’s.

As Intel’s actions look rather desperate, analysts believe that Intel’s challenges are existential. “Intel’s issues are now approaching the existential,” Stacy Rasgon, an analyst with Bernstein, told Reuters.

  • Magister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I got an AMD 386sx33, dx4-100, Duron 1000, Athlon xp2200, (some Intel here, P4, Atom), then a 5600H now in a mini PC.

  • profdc9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    My guess is Intel’s management is full of inflexible dead weight that doesn’t want to adapt to the new reality that PCs are only going to become less and less relevant as a computing model. Like other companies that had established cash-cow businesses like Sears with its mail-order catalog, Kodak with film, Motorola with analog mobile phones, etc., current management doesn’t want to jeopardize their positions by allowing a new business to dominate, and so the company is doomed to a slow death.

  • darki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    More than that, for years their CPUs have been eating more and more watts and the electricity prices went up… Just keep them on par with AMD CPUs… But still , most default to Intel…

  • forgotmylastusername@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It took long enough for the market to wake up to it. They dragged their ass for what like 10 years without much real innovation. And everyone knew it the whole time. Then Apple ditched them. That alone should have been a huge sign. Apple does not fuck around. They definitely knew Intel had been rotting from the inside out.

    • mrmanager@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Apple likes to control the entire ecosystem, and wanted to make their own processors to make them more efficient and produce less heat. They succeeded too, the M2 and M3 chips are incredible.

      So I think they would have ditched anyone, but Intel probably also made it easier by being so bad. :)

      • forgotmylastusername@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        more efficient and produce less heat

        Which was impossible to do with x86 space heater. Maybe if Intel hadn’t sat idle and actually produced more efficient design. We could be reading about Apples own spin of x86 instead of ARM.

      • Zetta@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        You are 200% correct, apple didn’t ditch Intel because Intel, apple did it because apple.

  • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Fucking good! I know it’s not the primary reason, but it’s by high time that people see laying off 15k people as a bad thing and the company suffering for it.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I fear it’s wishful thinking that the layoffs are what made the stock tank. It’s certainly never hurt anyone else…

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think the AI thing has really caught them off guard. There’s a gold rush and they have no real shovels to sell.

          Intel’s only hope now is for the Chinese army to go for a holiday in Taiwan. Their competitors are hugely reliant on TSMC. That’s been brewing forever though, and hopefully will continue to not come to anything. The last thing the world needs right now is more fucking war…

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        layoffs are what made the stock tank

        Yeah, it’s usually the opposite: Layoffs by themselves usually make the stock go up, as the company is reducing their expenses.

        The issue with Intel is that they announced layoffs combined with a bad earnings call, so it’s a sign the company isn’t going so well.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          The actions we are taking will make Intel a leaner, simpler and more agile company.

          Oof, now agile bullshit talk is infecting the lingo of the c-suite and being used as justification to do layoffs. I should’ve seen that coming, though I must’ve skipped the portion of the agile manifesto that said to choose Lamborghinis over employees.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Time to buy?

    I’m pretty sure the US gov views them as too big to fail. Surely they can’t mess up Xe, Falcon Shores, and the foundry business, right?

    RIGHT!?

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I bought AMD at $8 a share (and still hold it, and Xilinx that got folded into it), and I am buying some Intel soon.

      The price is right.

      I may be an idiot, but I was right once.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      They could, but the US government has a strong interest in keeping them around. Not only do they do a huge amount of development, and not just on CPUs, but they also have the largest share of government purchasing by far.

      • trolololol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yep maybe but I think the difference of IT and banks is that if your research and innovation department get defunded you are basically selling the same shit year over year but competitors are not.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Nice to just imagine that this was backlash to the inhumanity of the constant layoffs. It’s not, but would be nice.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Nope. It’s the bad financial results, news of defective CPUs, and most crucially, Intel announcing they’re going to stop paying out dividends that have done this.

      If anything, investors seem to love mass layoffs, unfortunately.

    • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Burst layoffs to polish up earnings reports are “fine” (in terms of stocks), but hemorrhaging workers when your company is already in hot water for product quality complaints smells of “We’re really desperate to make our reports not look devastating”. From a stupid monkey brain point of view, it sounds like they’re throwing sailors overboard to avoid sinking and I wouldn’t want to be a passenger and risk being next, so I’d try to sell what shares I have before they’re worthless.

      I don’t know what heuristics professional traders go with, but I imagine they would follow a more complex and nuanced logic along those same lines. Either way, if enough people do that, it compounds.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    After how horribly they handled the whole hardware defect scandal with their 13th and 14th gen i Series processors, this is 100% deserved.

    Intel is a cautionary tale of what happens when you allow bean counters who care more about EBITDA than their customers and staff to run the show.

    • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      This sounds like a modern day version of the Schlitz mistake back in the seventies where they cut the quality so much, so fast, that the formerly largest brewery in America became a worthless brand that nobody trusted.

      The b-school lesson from this was to drop the quality of your product more slowly so people wouldn’t notice.

      I figured no big company would ever suffer consequences from shitty product ever again because they’d figured out the drip instead of the open floodgates.

      I hope more companies get to enjoy this fate, especially food producers.

  • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I bought an Intel last time because I got AMD the time before that and they had issues that I can’t recall right now. Security or they had to slow it down?

    Luckily, I’m still on a 11th Gen. I guess I’m going back to AMD when I decide to upgrade again.

    • Randelung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Skylake myself, after a FX 9590 as a last ditch effort.

      I’ll never get a P/E core CPU. Windows 11 fucked with virtualization and now the scheduler somehow breaks VMWare, all because my Desktop CPU somehow needs to be as power efficient as a laptop CPU when idle cores already hardly consume power. And spoiler: Otherwise I want to use the power I bought.

      New build will be AMD, and only when the old one starts breaking. Now that I think about it, I should research if I can move BitLocker drives to a new system.

    • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Intel has had more security stuff that slowed it down than amd.

      Amd had some usb dropout issues but otherwise has been pretty solid for Ryzen.

    • djsaskdja@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      The x86-64 CPU market has felt stagnant for a while. The real innovation seems to be happening with ARM and mobile. In which Intel is way behind. Might explain some of the news from today.

    • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s true, but Intel fucked around for years and now they’re finding out. I’m happy to watch them stew for a year or so before getting back on their feet.

  • TheFrirish@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    shoutout to the guy on wall street bets dunking 700k before it tanked to 30%

      • fatalicus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Just a regular stock buy, so up. Lost around 200k so far.

        But he did say he was going to sit on the stocks for some years, so might get some back.