• MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I skimmed the headline too quickly when I saw “billionaire” and “panicked last call” then I thought she was somehow involved in insider trading for Tesla stock.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dude! The poor woman was assassinated by Elon Musk and they had to drag her through the mud by mentioning that her sister is into bestiality and married with a turtle?

    re-reads headline Oh she was a billionaire? Carry on, then 🤷

  • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Billionaire Kryptonite recipe.

    One part billionaire, one part Tesla, two parts billionaire tears. Shake well and douse with copious volumes of lake water. Chef’s kiss

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    When your Tesla is on fire, or sinking, you can play a fun little game called “Find the manual door release”

      • arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is, you just have to find it while the car sinks or the flames spread. It’s not the normal button that a user might be accustomed to pushing to get out so they might not know where it is and finding it in time might be the difference between life and death. For front doors it’s usually a lever somewhere but in some model Ys and the cybertruck the rear door release is hidden. under a mat in the door recess.

  • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is horrifying. A manual window breaking device that is part of the interior of the car should be standard by now. It wouldn’t be that difficult to design. This is not a Tesla exclusive problem.

    • Brekky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doesn’t seem there’s a tool available for breaking laminated glass. Which is also terrifying but I do understand why the DOT mandated the switch.

    • dariusj18@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      In most cars I would say use the headrest, but my assumption on that the trasla.did something dumb to make those not useful either.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never actually thought about this, but you’re right. Wtf isn’t this a standard, and part of saftey scores?

      For some cars you can remove the head rest and use the metal prongs, but it’s still probably not as good as an actual purpose built punch.

  • Arthur_Leywin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Annnnnd I’m becoming a worse person cuz this put a smile on my face. Honestly it’s partially her fault for trusting Elon’s company.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If anyone’s curious, it looks like you “hold the brake and swipe up” on a touchscreen area to go in drive, and “hold the brake and swipe down” to go into reverse.

    So yeah, it’s not a physical shifter, though it seems pretty intuitive and simple. BUT if you’re in reverse and try to swipe up to drive(like you’d do during a 3 point turn) , you have no feedback aside from looking at the screen to let you know it actually registered your shift.

    IMO this is another idiotic implementation at going cheap on physical controls or “being high tech fancy” that shouldn’t exist. It’s dumb to not have important functions give physical feedback while driving. I’m not laying most of the blame on tesla for this. It still sounds like she’s the one who really screwed herself, but I’d all but guarantee there’s going to be a lawsuit for this one, and rightly so. Fuck all this touch control crap in cars. It’s lousy enough just on the radios.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      How’s that any different?

      • My current Tesla has a stalk to click up/down to go into reverse/drive, but I always verify before taking my foot off the brake
      • my Subaru had a physical shifter on the console to move forward or back to a specific selection , but I always verified by taking my foot off the brake
      • I used to have a Pontiac with a shifter stalk on the steering wheel that I move to a specific selection, but I always verified before taking my foot off the brake
    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even a button shift. Literally just a row of buttons, select your gear by pressing it. Reverse would be under a safety cover so you don’t hit it at 60mph.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        Ελληνικά
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or, you just have logic in the car’s software that stops you from shifting to reverse over 5mph.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t trust software. Just don’t. Software crashes planes. There’s no way car companies are programming better than plane companies. You can certainly have the feature, but a safety cover should also exist in such a configuration. There’s no reason, except shareholder primacy, to not include it.

    • olympicyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Swiping up to drive is the same direction as tap up to reverse from a previous model Tesla. Kind of like how trackpads and mouse scroll wheels work in opposite directions. I can see how it’s not so intuitive if the direction contradicts 35 years of muscle memory.

    • qwertilliopasd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is the worst idea ever. When I drove a snow plow I would shift from forward to reverse and back hundreds of times a storm. Without taking my eyes off my surroundings.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s simple but it’s not easy, because it’s complex.

      If there’s anything we’ve learned in human history of engineering and design it’s that complexity kills when relying on human nature to control.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      But bro, you’ll save like $0.87 per car by not including a physical gearshifter. Won’t anyone think of the poor shareholders footing that bill.

    • Thann@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget the fancy electric door handles that stop working when you back into a pond.

      There are emergency override handles, but not everyone knows where they are or how to use them, so they’re not all that useful in an emergency.

      These deadly features are purely cosmetic, so I would lay a decent amount of blame is on tesla

      • Signtist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Stupid cosmetic designs have been an issue for a long time. There was a theater fire in Chicago in the early 1900’s where a bunch of people died because they couldn’t figure out how to use the fancy door handles while panicking and being crushed by everyone trying to get out. That’s the reason why exit doors on buildings with a high occupancy are now required to swing out, and have those pushbar locks that allow the door to open even if you’re just falling on it.

        If it’s possible that someone will need to use something while panicking, it needs to be as simple, intuitive, and failproof as possible

        • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I volunteer Elon as a test monkey. Lock him in a tesla that’s underwater and have him “engineer” <cough> his ass out of it.

        • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If it’s possible

          It’s always “possible”. In fact, it’s inevitable that an accident or emergency will happen. They happen every day. It’s clearly Tesla’s fault for having terrible controls but what else is new?

          That’s why we have dedicated first responders instead of just fire hoses everywhere. Many fires can be stopped with just some baking soda or a wet towel, but non-professionals can’t be trusted to act rationally in that situation.

        • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Wanted to chime in and clarify, the major issue there is you cannot operate a door handle in a crush, no matter how much of your senses you have. Can’t use a door handle if you can’t use your arms. Am drunk on the internet and hope this isn’t interpreted as a hostile reply.

          • Adramis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            But isn’t the point of crash bar locks that just the act of being crushed against the door will force it open? The only thing you have to do to open it is push on it or be pushed into it. Of course that won’t help you when you fall as the door swings open and get trampled, but it’s better than everyone burning to death.

      • MashedPotatoJeff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I had my way, regulations would require a physical connection for all door handles, and not just that a secondary physical release be available. I don’t know how you would go about finding injuries associated with each design as a layperson, but I bet there’s a death or two associated with each novel design.

        An old man roasted in his Cadillac XLR because the battery was dead and he didn’t know where the secondary release was. I think it’s under the seat on that car. I don’t care how cool that electronic door release was, or if the old man was negligent in not knowing his exits; it wasn’t worth his life.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is why I liked driving the newer Army vehicles or well cared for Humvees. Everything was labeled. Anything important to not hit accidentally had a safety cover. And anything not obvious like an out of sight fire extinguisher has a high visibility sign pointing to it from your normal field of view.

          Fuck fashion, give me cars that are comfortable and safe.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          And let’s not forget that there are people who have flexibility issues that can’t reach under their seat in an emergency.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The front driver and passenger emergency handles are so intuitively placed that every Tesla owner has to warn all their passengers not to use them.

        The back is another story entirely if they even have them, but the front are fine.

        Edit: I will grant people might forget after not using them for years in a moment of panic. But they know.

      • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I love how they made the emergency door release a multi step process, which on some models recommended a flat head screwdriver or in others only is for the front doors.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The only regulations we have is that we’re not allowed to implement European safety features.

            An exaggeration, but damn does it feel that way.

      • anivia@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        These deadly features are purely cosmetic

        No, electronic door handles are not cosmetic, they save a lot more lives than than they kill by people drowning or burning alive in their car because they are too stupid to read their cars manual.

        Since you apparently do not know this, the purpose of electronic door handles is for the car to be able to lock you out from opening the door if there is a car or bicycle approaching from behind in your blind spot. That’s why you only see them in cars with blind spot radars

        That being said, Teslas design is still terrible. In Audis the electronic door handle doubles up as the mechanical emergency door handle, you just need to pull on it harder than normal and it will engage the manual mechanism

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So it needs to fail open then. Without a charge it should fail into a position it can be opened or actually open itself.

          This is not a new issue. Failure engineering has been around for a long time.

        • Thann@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bro, you dont need electronc door-handles to have electronic locks,

        • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          they save a lot more lives than than they kill

          Do they? Can you provide any examples?

          the purpose of electronic door handles is for the car to be able to lock you out from opening the door if there is a car or bicycle approaching from behind in your blind spot.

          Seems like they created a lot of unnecessary risk to alleviate a relatively minor problem.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anton Yelchin was also done in by a not too dissimilar feature. The gear shift of his vehicle returned to a “neutral position” after shifting so unless you looked at the letter indicator you may not realize what gear you’re in.

      • nexusband@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s however not a good comparison because you still have a physical “way” of feeling where you are shifting to. I never had an issue with shifters that return to neutral, even in very high stress situations.

        Touch controls are however a very different thing, because you have absolutely no indication if you actually shifted or not.

        In fact, Ive had various cars now with return to neutral shifters - the new Mazda CX-60/70/80/90 don’t have this and I happend to shift in neutral, simply resting my hand on the shifter…

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          My prius is like this and every once in a while if I let of the brake a touch to soon while I shift it won’t register going from drive to reverse, or the other way around. It’s annoying, but something I’m aware of. Something that never happens with a physical shifter.

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m curious. In what situations do shifters need to return to neutral? Like, at a stop? Or when you open the door? Why neutral and not park, for example? Or is park also neutral in EV lingo?

          • Furbag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Return to neutral” does not mean neutral gear in this context. If you shift an old Prius into Drive, the shifter knob snaps back to the center of the jig, which is a neutral position for it to be in. It doesn’t stay in the Drive slot while the car is in Drive. You can probably find photos or videos of this out there somewhere.

            • El Barto@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Edit: I understand it better. Thanks. Yeah, I think that can be annoying too. You have to pay attention to the knob in order to know which gear you are in, and when it lands where you want it to land. I guess new drivers would be more comfortable with that.

              Thanks for the explanation!

              Thanks, but that doesn’t sound like the OP is describing, though. You’re saying that in the old Prius, you put the car in Drive and it will stay in Drive. Whereas OP seems to be implying that they put it in Drive, and then the car switched to Neutral (not Drive anymore.) Otherwise, why would anyone be annoyed by that?

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have the same annoyance with my prius. It’s a physical shifter you move, but it electronically shifts and the shifter always goes back to the same spot. If I try shifting in a hurry it won’t register every so often.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean one less billionaire is probably a benefit to society but I’m sure the vast majority of her wealth stayed within the family. Likely it just made some rich people even richer.

  • moitoi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It was cold out, so she decided to take her Tesla Model X SUV for the four-minute drive rather than walk.

    It says everything.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      A four-minute drive is like a 20-minute walk. If it was really that cold, I may have done the same thing.

      The way you portray it, “it says everything,” is not fair - and yes, I know we’re talking about a billionaire. Like, she deserved to die because she didn’t want to walk in the cold.

      Her death shouldn’t have happened the way it did. And again, yes, I know she’s a billionaire, fuck billionaires, etc etc. But her mistake was not being careful while driving, and potentially the car not being safe enough (e.g. doors jam-locked?)

      • Knightfox@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree with the sentiment that we shouldn’t be praising people’s deaths, but I want to point out the cold part

        Texas Hill Country loosely covers an area around Fredricksburg Texas with San Antonio and Austin being just on the outskirts. Looking back at the weather reports, and not knowing the exact location, the temperature on 2/10 was a low of 45-65 degrees F. Considering the lows typically come in in the late hours of the night the more realistic temperature was somewhere between 50-75 degrees F.

        Also, you can see the picture of the ranch in the article which also says it’s a 900 acre ranch. 900 acres is only 1.4 sq miles. It’s one thing to say a 4 min drive at 35 mph vs walking, but realistically it’s a lot slower speed and thus a lot shorter walk.

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Point taken, but regardless, it still doesn’t merit some rando say “Driving instead of walking because it’s cold? It says everything - NO WONDER she died!!!” It’s a silly thing to conclude.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, if it’s cold, I will often make a 4-minute drive instead of walking 20 minutes from my guest house to my main house on my own property. It’s so relatable to most Americans!

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You just want to bash billionaires, and I’ve already addressed that in my original comment. If you don’t want to understand my point, that’s on you. Stop with the strawman arguments.

      • twistypencil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Cold, in Texas? I mean, I’m sure it gets cold, but it’s not Canada and people go on 20min walks in the dead of winter with their dogs there. Awful way to die, no question.

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Oh I understand. But it’s all about perspective.

          Someone living in Siberia may say “cold in Canada? Silly geese.”

          I come from a tropical climate in which people wear jackets when it’s 21 C (31 C being the average all year round.) In my mind, 21 degrees Celsius (about 68 F I think) was damn cold.

          Of course, I now laugh about that.

          But I won’t judge her for not wanting to be cold and using a maybe seemingly reasonable way to do that.

          • Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            My first trip to Florida from Ohio I was on a tour at Kennedy Space Center. When I got there I noticed all the people in jackets, it was 65F, I was perplexed. Now the opposite is also true, I hate weather over 80F, too dang hot.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            See that’s why living in Arizona is so much fun. There’s some park ranger in Death Valley but what’s the odds on running into them online?

            • El Barto@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Lol! That was funny :)

              But anyway, Arizona can have cold snaps, right? Like 32 F at night in January? I know New Mexico and Texas do.

              But that rarely happens at sea level in an actual tropical region, near the equator.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                You should look at Northern Arizona. Southern Arizona is really hot and then Northern Arizona is high plains that can rival Canada for snow every few years. (Fun fact, when they were wondering where all the snow was for the Vancouver Olympics? It was in Arizona, we stole it fair and square!)

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s 100% Tesla’s fault. Mechanical way to open doors is not obvious and hidden, sometimes all together missing. And car relies on power to open the door, which runs out when submerged. Shit car with shit ideas. There’s a reason why windows easily shatter on cars and Musk and his cult followers seem to think getting out of car in case of emergency is less important than sounding cool.

        • olympicyes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I bet her car didn’t have a shifting stalk. New Model X makes you shift using the touchscreen. I knew that idea sounded unsafe but holy moly.

            • olympicyes@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Swiping up to drive is the same direction as tap up to reverse from a previous model Tesla. Kind of like how trackpads and mouse scroll wheels work in opposite directions. I can see how it’s not so intuitive if the direction contradicts 35 years of muscle memory.

        • tmyakal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The pressure of the water against the door would’ve prevented her from opening it regardless of the door’s mechanical features or power supply issues.

          The windows not shattering is absolutely a Tesla design flaw, but there’s no way that woman was ever going to open a door from inside a submerged car.

          • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Pressure takes a while to build up and you generally can open the door before car sinks enough, it’s been tested. But even if you had to wait for car to fill with water, pressure would equalize then and you’d have no issues opening the door. Of course, you need to keep calm to use all of those tricks but car taking them away from you just increases risk of something like that happening.

          • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s wouldn’t be a factor once the water entered the car. The pressure equalises if there water is on both side of the door.

          • perestroika@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            True, but there’s some more.

            Over here, ice roads are opened on typical winters on several smaller bays. The instruction to drivers is:

            • don’t wear a seatbelt
            • if ice breaks, open your door swiftly (get out first, then think about calling people)
            • if you can’t open the door, lower your window swiftly
            • if you can’t lower the window, break it (the side window, not the windshield - a windshield is multilayer laminate, too strong to break quickly)

            Typically, if a car sinks on an ice road, people are likely to get out. A crank-operated window is handy in such a case. But regardless of instruction, sometimes folks do die. :(

            In general, I would not like to experience any sort of extreme incident in an over-engineered car. I’d prefer something from the 1970-ties, but with airbags.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Okay but a door that just works is going to be easier to get open before water pressure makes that impossible. Also, once there’s enough water in the car, a mechanical door will open just fine. At which point you swim for it in the opposite direction the car is moving.

  • june@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh no

    Anyway, I’m going to Vegas later this week to get messy with my friends for my 40th. Anyone have any recommendations for places to hit?

    • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anyone have any recommendations for places to hit?

      There are probably a few billionaires in Vegas… hit them. The messier you make it, the stronger the message.

    • Mike D.@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Remember, what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas. Except for herpes. That shit’ll come back with you.”

    • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Stromboli at 4 kegs.

      Super sketch building and parking lot.

      Red vinyl booths and decor not updated since Elvis was a teenager truck driver.

      Bartenders who’ve seen the hard times.

      Open 24/7

      Drinking

      Smoking

      Gambling

      High likelihood of hepatitis A, B, C and as of yet unknown variants

      And the best fucking stromboli this side of the Gambino family

      http://www.fourkegs.com/

      Also, your first stop out of the Vegas airport should always be for early morning drinks at the Double Down Saloon. I’ll let you figure out that that gem of a property on your own.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why would you ever pay to drink in Vegas? Head immediately to the Rite Aid and get alcohol like everyone else. Or go to any sports betting section in a casino. Drinks are free.

    • zeekaran@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Golden Tiki is an excellent bar. That whole area has great food too.

      And if you know anything about Meow Wolf, their third location is a short ride away. It’s called Omega Mart. It’s fine to go in drunk but it’s better to start sober and get drinks at their bar.

    • Sidewalker@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have some humanity. I fucking hate Mitch and the GOP as much as anyone, but this seems like nothing more than a tragic accident. The woman had a family and Im grieving their loss. This sucks all around.

      • zcd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you could push a button and get $1 million but a random person dies, would you push it? Billionaires are pushing that button all day every day, a many times as they possibly can

        • Sidewalker@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would not push such a button.

          I don’t think the kids who just miss their mom this morning are undeserving of my empathy no matter how much money the mom had. I can’t just turn off how I feel about this. I am sorry I made so many here angry though.

      • ABCDE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Im grieving their loss

        That’s seems odd for someone you don’t know or care about at all.

        • Sidewalker@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know why, but it’s easy for me to imagine a person out there just grieving the loss of their mom this morning, and in turn imagining how I might feel in their shoes. It feels bad, and my heart does go out to them.

          I am sorry that I made so many people here angry, but I can’t turn off how I feel about it. i stand by it.

          • ABCDE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think anyone is angry towards you. You can put yourself in their shoes but grieving is a pretty personal experience, usually because it’s someone you knew.

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. These people have absolutely no qualms about sacrificing peons like us by the millions if it makes them a few dollars more. I will not mourn human dragons, I will instead revel in their demise and scream it from the rooftops.

        • Plague_Doctor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          True, they were ready to send us all back to work at the start of the pandemic, no matter how many of us died or had family members killed.

        • Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          As seen in Isreal and the pandemic response. $$$$ is worth more than the life of minions to them. Humanity is better off without that scum.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        She’s a fucking billionaire that spends holidays with Mitch McConnell.

        No one she knows gives a single fuck about you or anyone you know.

        And they’re actively hurting millions of people without a second thought.

        Don’t waste your pity on someone like this

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          To be fair, the plea was for humanity, not billionairity. At some point this person was an infant and we’d protect and care about her then.

          Yes, the inequality is atrocious and her party is cruel and ruthless about expanding it, but therein lies the catch - we’re all gonna go some day. Right? Literally at the end of it we’re all the same in that regard. (cryogenicists and brain-in-a-computer people to the left)

          So I think it’s a crazy and sad story, I feel bad for the human, but the larger metaphor is ok to be temporarily amused by, imho. Y’know the problem with the French Revolution was they got really into beheading people. Children, pets, etc. Like, way more than anyone should, “even though” etc. Because if we lose that humanity we’re worse off than we are now, right?

          Anyway, don’t sweat the downvotes, humanity person. It’s just people being mad about billionaires, and who isn’t?

      • Hominine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wow this thread is a straight condemnation of Lemmy’s high-horse. It’s wild that the comment above yours is neutralized on votes and yours is so far in the negative. What did you do that was so worthy of condemnation? Express concern for another human being’s family.

        Of course, people here will tell you that billionaires discount lives on daily even while they discount the lives of the loved ones of this woman. Were all of them billionaires? Perhaps. Regardless of the size of their pockets we do know that they are human.

        Folks that lean left generally understand what it’s like to be caught in the circumstances of your birth. It’s incredibly telling that this self-same group finds it so easy to dismiss the value of this human life and those around her.

        You’re right to be concerned for the well-being of others, and I believe I’m right to be concerned about the company we’re keeping here. It’s seemingly a group of people that will dismiss the death of someone wealthy, even while they assume the wealthy will dismiss the death of the poor. I wouldn’t say it’s entirely incorrect even though it’s just as morally bankrupt.

        • ABCDE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Folks that lean left generally understand what it’s like to be caught in the circumstances of your birth. It’s incredibly telling that this self-same group finds it so easy to dismiss the value of this human life and those around her.

          You seem to have attributed feelings of people here to one side or the other, how and why? Do you have a record of how each person leans politically?

        • aidan@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          So much online discourse I’ve seen on here is just the same as Reddit. Stripping the humanity of people you don’t like. It’s just tribalist, cringey, and narcissistic.

          • ABCDE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not really; did you grieve for people you heard of dying in the news the other day? Grieving isn’t just being sad for a brief moment then moving on with your day.

        • Sidewalker@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s okay. I realize lots of people are suffering and as a result tensions are high. I didn’t mean to make everyone so angry and I realize my initial comment of ‘have some humanity’ was to harsh. I’m sorry I made so many people angry with this.

          I do feel bad for the people that loved this woman regardless of how much money she has. I don’t wish that pain on anyone.

              • Would you consider RATM an authority on how I should feel?

                I mean, fuck billionaires in any sense that actually matters. They shouldn’t get to hoard wealth while real people can’t afford housing, medical care, etc. At the same time, I refuse to laugh at a human being drowning to death. Literally nobody deserves that. I’m also morally opposed to the death penalty.

                Maybe I’m just not hardcore enough.

          • Hominine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I fail to see how not having a modicum of empathy for this person’s family after their horrific death qualifies as “standing up for myself,” but do feel free to explain this worldview in detail.

            • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              This person would have no second thought at you dying in this car. Or your family. Therefor you are defending and standing up for someone who would trash you. It’s just sad to watch from the outside is all.

              • Hominine@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                This person would have no second thought at you dying in this car. Or your family.

                Even if this were true, are we to assume the same of this woman’s grandchildren? Her distant family?
                Regardless, I fail to see the need to laugh at a terrible death, and that is certainly not standing up for anyone’s moral compass but my own.

                The sad state of affairs here is how far you and others like you are removed from your humanity.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Empathy is not the opposite of standing up for yourself, though thinking so does explain a hell of a lot of leftist politics these days.

            • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Depends on the context of the situation in my opinion but I understand where you are coming from. I’ve found if someone has no empathy for me. I should not return the favor to them as they’ve shown their hand. Does that make me spiteful? Probably. But I really love the quote. “Listen when someone tells you who they are”. As you can tell I’m callous and don’t have empathy for billionaires or ultra rich.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    🎉

    More dead billionaires pls!

    Preferably at the hands of the billions of people who suffer every day because of those evil fucks.

    I’ll take the occasional billionaire freak accident death when we’re blessed with one, but we’re WAY overdue for guillotine day.