Thomas Matthew Crooks, the suspectin Saturday’s shooting, was registered as a Republican voter, according to Pennsylvania records.

Already the republicans are dismissing his voter registration as meaningless. Here comes the “mental illness” angle.

Edit: apparently it’s not uncommon to register with the party you oppose in PA. This is going to be a fun ride.

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        He was 20. He could have voted only in a single election. Someone said he donated to democrats 3 years ago. This math is confusing the fucking out of me.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Unfortunately I think what we’re going to learn is that he’s one of those people that register Republican to vote in their primaries to choose the weakest candidate giving Democrats a better chance.

          Either way I unfortunately think this is going to give Trump yet another boost… God knows that’s what we needed…

          • MagicShel@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            That’s possible. Because we damn sure aren’t going to learn that people are more complicated than a simple black & white label.

            If this comes across as argumentative, I don’t mean it that way. It’s just pure cynicism.

          • Gerudo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            I read a snippit that in PA, it’s not uncommon to register for the other party. More than likely, he really was a dem/non repub.

          • MagicShel@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            17 year olds, supposedly. (I can’t verify the three years ago, so grain of salt.)

            This doesn’t really make sense and we might just have to wait for actual details from the investigation.

            • dragontamer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              Some people are saying $10, which is a lot more to a kid than to an adult. But kids can afford $10.

          • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            With just the same first and last name, where as the Republican party registration had other corroborating data, such as middle initial, address, and date of birth.

            So the donation is nowhere near as solid as the Republican party registration.

        • jeffw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          The donation? Source on that? Not doubting you

          Edit: I am now doubting you. Found the FEC filing and it lists a Bethel Park, PA zip code.

    • style99@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Follow the money. Who paid him to do the shooting is what we should be asking.

    • retrospectology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Maybe one of his cultists actually realized he’s been lying to them for the past 8 years. It’s a far fall from where MAGA is back down to reality.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah, hating Trumpism is certainly the expected angle, but a Boogaloo type looking to start a civil war couldn’t ask for a better target. Even if he actually was for all the Trump stuff he might think a civil war is necessary and Trump winning the election would just continue the muddled mess where liberals still get to make some decisions.

  • Ioughttamow@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Conservatives when a poc is convicted of rape:”if that was my daughter I’d happily be in JAIL now!”

    Conservatives when their violent , rapist prez gets shot: “this is the democrats fault since they call him a fascist, let’s pull back the violent rhetoric peeps”

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Only that the “let’s” is referring to only Democrats. Republican/alt-right people will continue to use violent rhetoric.

    • papertowels@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The heck does “they got the wrong guy” mean? Is this someone else? Was this recorded after the shooting?

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Someone said that wasn’t him? It sure looks like him though. Couldn’t see some random dude looking like him and posting that.

      Grand. So we’ll find out what his affiliations are.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s supposedly a troll who resembles the shooter. Let’s vet sources a little more before just blindly posting things.

  • HRDS_654@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Of course they are are, and the MAGA cult will buy it saying it was a deep state conspiracy to discredit them or some bullshit like that.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      the MAGA cult will buy it saying it was a deep state conspiracy to discredit them

      Isn’t it funny how every single time a psycho with a long history of supporting republicans turns out to just be a deep state crisis actor paid by Soros to discredit them?

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Its for the parties themselves.

      But to answer your question, theres intentionally no list of citizens. The only way to verify that they can vote is registration, unless you want a passport or birth cert or whatever

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      You can register as Unaffiliated fwiw, you don’t have to choose Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, or Independant. It’s mainly a choice of which primary to vote in anyway.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Any time you apply for a driver’s license or whatever, you are asked if you want to register with a party. That is the party that you will vote for in the primary elections. Some (many?) states offer same day registration which, in my opinion, is how it should be. It puts you in a database in case voter fraud ACTUALLY happens (insanely rare) where they can check to make sure Ur Quell only voted once and investigate what happened if they see multiple votes.

      As for the primaries: This is how the US handles our version of Ranked Choice and… I kind of prefer it (with some major caveats). The general idea is that all right wing politicians should run for the republican seat and all sane people for the Democrat seat. You campaign at the tail end of the previous year and the party members vote on you in the spring. There is definitely some sketchiness with super delegates (although, that is not overly dissimilar from how many parliament systems pick a Prime Minister), but this creates a unified front come November.

      Yes, two party systems are bad, but that is what things tend to converge on when push comes to shove. Just look at France where the Left more or less unified to stand a chance against fascism.

      Like almost every aspect of the US government: it is a fundamentally good system that needs to be iterated on and better taught to the populace. It is just that republicans know that education hurts them and want to take advantage of all the loopholes that Tommy Jefferson obviously intentionally wrote while he was raping his plantation full of slaves.

    • OsaErisXero@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      For primaries, parties may close their primaries to only registered members of the party to vote in

    • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Can’t have homeless people or people with limited means actually voting. A republican would never win again.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      republicans need barriers for people of color, poor people and young people traditionally to avoid full participation in democracy. In this modern time, some states actually still require you to print paper applications and mail them to your Secretary of State’s office at the post office with a physical stamp to register to vote… The list of individual barriers to completion within those seemingly small actions can not be overstated, especially to young people who on average don’t own home printers and may have literally never bought a stamp or mailed a physical letter.

  • tugrim@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    He definitely could be Republican and I would not dismiss it at all. However, in the state of Pennsylvania it’s common to register for the party primaries of the opposing party whose candidate is someone you’re not in favor of and vote for someone else. It should be clear this does not mean he’s not a Republican or imply that he might be a Democrat. It’s only to add some context.

    Source: https://ballotpedia.org/Primary_elections_in_Pennsylvania

    • quixotic120@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I wouldn’t say it’s common, that’s misleading. some people do it, probably, but I’ve lived in PA for 2 decades and have never met anyone who has claimed to do so nor have I seen any actual statistics on the matter

      • Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        As much as I’ve heard this parroted in multiple places since yesterday, I think this is just a talking point to edge towards it. In another couple of days it wont be maybe. It’s directed to make it a left vs right, while, what’s so outrageous about him being Republican and not liking Trump? It’s not like there hasn’t been a huge divide in the Republican party, so much so that we have the “alt right”

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        My older sister has been doing it since the 80s. I don’t think there’s very many of them because assholes keep winning the Republican primaries

      • tugrim@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That’s fair, you’re right as I haven’t seen statistics either. While I don’t do it myself, I’ve seen many speak about doing this over the years though I’ve only lived in PA for a little over a decade.

        Edit: autocorrect

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      He also has donated to Democratic cause three years ago. Might not mean anything but we’ll see if they better figure out this guy.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Dunno how they would’ve done that, wasn’t he shot from another roof by a sniper while he was still posing an active threat? That’s the image I got from some articles

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          If law enforcement sees a guy on a rooftop with a gun threatening a crowd of people, though, that’s an acceptable situation for “shoot first, ask questions later”. That shot that killed the guy probably saved other lives.

            • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              They also allow people to keep shooting.

              That is some Hollywood shit, in real life you shoot until the threat is neutralized, it could have been another las vegas

            • teft@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              No one in the history of actual combat shooting is taught to take non lethal shots. Ever.

                • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  It’s the normal procedure here in Finland to try to take someone down with shooting in the legs or somewhere else that they might survive from. Not the case if they start shooting of course, it’s more for situation where they’re wielding a knife and coming for the cop or someone else

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                What do you mean with combat shooting? Because here in Finland police is trained to (and required by law) to try to minimize the damage and if possible, to stop someone without killing them, usually by shooting at the legs etc. But that’s more for knife fielding attacker and other situation where such shots are more possible and not when the cops or others are being shot at

              • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                Idk what your talking about. You shoot the gun out of the hand. Then you shoot the hat off for intimidation and the somewhere nearby you shoot the rope of someone getting hanged to free them to kinda balance things out. This is all common sense.

            • dhork@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              If you’re standing 20 feet in front of the guy, yes. If your only shot is across a field from one rooftop to another, you have much less control over where the bullet hits.

              • teft@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                At those distances (200-300 meters going by the map i saw) with professional shooters they can put multiple rounds inside of a spot the size of a dime. That isn’t the point though, you shoot to kill in those situations. Non lethal shots are hollywood shit.

            • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              Non-lethal shots are a fantasy.

              You have plenty of blood vessels in your limbs and it is very easy to bleed out via the femoral artery or whatever else. This is literally why tourniquets exist

              Assuming it is an actual threat and not a black kid with a toy train: Shoot to kill and then, when it is safe, have EMTs try to keep them alive.

            • constantokra@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              They’re less lethal, not non lethal, and they’re frequently used as an excuse to escalate violence needlessly. I’m very critical of the use of their use of force and would generally prefer police to be unarmed, but this is not a situation where I have any complaints. That threat needed to be neutralized as quickly and effectively as possible. Overwhelming force was the best way to do that.

  • Today@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    My biggest hope now is that he legally purchased the gun with no background check from a maga at a gun show.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      You really think that any of the cultists are going to care about what actually happened?

      Their story will be that he’s a transwoman high on legal weed who listened to woke podcasts about Gaza.

    • Trump’s already not pro-gun. He passed some of the most significant “anti” gun legislation during his term. Thing is, he’s a pathological liar, so it doesn’t matter what comes out of his mouth. He’ll stay on the “pro-gun” rhetoric, and when he’s elected will enact more anti-gun legislation, especially now that he’s been on the receiving end.

      And it won’t matter, because MAGA’s gonna MAGA. He’ll lose maybe a few truly 2A-focused people, but it won’t matter because after 2024 there will be no more free elections in the US.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Trump’s already not pro-gun.

        Point of order: Trump’s not anything except Pro-Trump. THAT’S IT. That is the sum total of his actual identifiable personal beliefs.

        He’s a demented narcissist and a sociopath. He’s a rapist, a fraud, a money launderer for human traffickers, he’s a traitor, a colluder, and a piece of shit.

        But he is absolutely NOT “not pro-gun”. He does not give a single solitary shit-in-a-vacuum. This has been proven. It Is Known.

  • vortic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    PA has a closed primary. In closed primaries, people tend to switch their registration in order to effect the primary they see as most impactful. It is not unlikely that the shooter registered as republican to vote against Trump in the primary.

  • dragontamer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Thank god this is getting muddled.

    I’ll take a win where I can. The election is too close for comfort now (or even leaning towards a Trump victory right now). We have time to change that, but we need to recognize the threat is growing right now.

  • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Biden’s next presser:

    Fuck Donald Trump, fuck Don Jr., fuck Trump’s staff, his business company and as a motherfucking candidate!

    And if you want to be down with MAGA Trump, then fuck you too! Barron XL: fuck you too! All you motherfuckers, fuck you too!

    What about Eric?

    Who???