https://x.com/i/status/1948211079001051267

The GOP chair was caught off guard and scrambled—first delaying the vote, then trying to sabotage it by adding amendments to include Biden administration communications. Democrats called their bluff and agreed.

Then the GOP chair, Rep. Higgins, lied, claiming the motion FAILED until Rep. Robert Garcia forced a full roll call vote.

Ultimately, the vote passed 8-2 after 3 Republicans DEFIED their leadership and joined all 5 Democrats to pass the motion.

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    sooooo GOP chair who blatantly tried to defraud the American people in a cushy government position by abusing his position, he’s tossed outta the swamp now, right?

    or rather, into the new swamp down in Florida

  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    So this subpoena means they get to review the documents, and presumably in their original state as well?

    So if they get redacted ones, that would be obstruction of justice, but the question becomes did the obstruction of justice happen as a result of his duties of office, or one of personal reasons.

    This still could get worse, even if the information that needs to come out does.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I suspect a lot of the GOP also want rid of Trump now he’s won for the second time.

    They’ve put in their time. They’re political lifers. They know they don’t really need him any more, and frankly his health will take care of that sooner rather than later.

    If he follows the rules, he can’t run again anyway. If he doesn’t then they don’t need him to win elections for them, because there won’t be any more. They’re just stuffing their pockets while waiting for any opportunity to try and get in a bigger chair. Their only worry is that someday, lobbyists might not want to bribe them any more to do their jobs.

    I suspect the list is being withheld for reasons other than Donald, who we all know is on it anyway. Plenty of more important shadowy figures who still have something to lose.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I think you’re right. They wanted the $3T tax cut, and that’s exactly what they got. Trump is now unnecessary risk for the oligarchs, I wouldn’t be surprised if they pin all of Epstein on him to dumpster his ass now. Then we’ll have 2.5 terms of President Vance to look forward to, as he works with Silicon Valley elites to replace the treasury with shitcoins.

    • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      There isn’t a list of abusers. The only person the files have evidence of abuse is Epstein himself. Per multiple sources interviewed by the NY Times, the only lists in the files are victims and witnesses, and releasing the files would just victimize them again to doxxing. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/24/us/politics/epstein-files-trump-bondi-justice-department-fbi.html

      Dems are jumping on the bandwagon because it distracts the Republicans from their rampage of destroying the foundations of our country, but the files themselves are a nothingburger as far any actual evidence of crimes.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    The video was fun to watch to watch.

    If my understanding is right, it just means this sub committee will now subpoena all documents. Not like it will be available to everybody, just available to the lawmakers. You must be a real pedophile-ophile to want to block your committee from having knowledge.

    • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I think GOP wants to get rid of Trump but keep MAGA. They’ve simply been unable to manipulate that outcome until now.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        The only way they can bifurcate Trump from MAGA is if they have an equally “charismatic” strongman that can take his place. It would especially help if he’s young.

        And it’s not Vance.

        • GraniteM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          I’m not convinced it can be anyone. Trump is a remarkable combination of horrible, stupid, and snake-oil-salesman charismatic. Anyone less stupid, and the base can tell that he’s just pretending to be like them, and they don’t like it. Anyone less charismatic can’t sell the con. Anyone less horrible would actually be less horrible, so that’d actually be better for all of us, but again I think then the base would turn on them for being insufficiently horrible.

          About the only one I can think of on the public stage right now who checks all those boxes is Marjorie Taylor Greene, and she’s a wOmAn, which also disqualifies her for a good chunk of the Trump base.

          But then again, this is the stupidest timeline, so for all I know they’ll just decide that Ron DeSantis is their new god when Trump finally exits the scene and deny that they ever hated Ron’s stupid fucking guts.

        • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          That’s why I keep my eye on Joe Rogan. I mean, folks tell me I’m nuts to think that a charismatic entertainer could make the transition to being President, but I’m not so sure. (/s, to be extra clear) I notice that he’s taking care to distance himself from the regime’s more-unpopular actions, but not break with it wholly.

  • webadict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Hey, where’s all those losers that kept saying the Dems didn’t actually want it released? Come on out of the woodwork, ya fucking losers.

    • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I mean, Pelosi IS out there going out of her way trying to downplay the whole thing. Having a couple members of either party agreeing to subpoena the files doesn’t mean either party, as a whole, is supporting it.

      • webadict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Keep on trying. One of these days, those Democrats will turn around and say not to reveal this info, and then that’ll vindicate the child-loving Republicans.

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Trust me bro one more rape charge on the rapist king and we beat fscist trust me bro. It will be a bombshell when everyone finds out what they already know and they SLAM him. One more scandal and we defeat facism trust me bro.

    • SparroHawc@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’ll be far, far from the nail in the coffin, but we’re already seeing promising movement among what was normally staunch Trump supporters.

      It’s only one avenue to follow though. We still have to do what we can wherever we can.

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      I’m guessing Roberts Rules stuff.

      As a quick and dirty thing, you can call a voice vote of ayes and nays. If it’s not particularly close, it’ll be obvious what the outcome is, the Chair will call the result, and everyone moves on. However, any member can call bullshit on the Chair, and then it goes to a more formal process.

      So without watching the whole damn video, it’s probably that the voice vote went one way, the Chair said it was the other, got called on it, and the roll call vote went against him.

    • Atlas_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      This is unsurprising.

      But forcing a recorded count does get those Republican Nays on record so they can be punished later.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      MAGAs can’t resist cheating at every opportunity. Here we are again with standard election fraud on a micro basis, but we’re supposed to believe that they won the 2024 Election “Fair & Square?”

    • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I’m not holding my breath but I’m really hoping that will help maga chuds clue in that the GOP are wholly dishonest.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I get what you’re saying, but there are now two very distinct news spheres, and the one that they’re watching will simply not cover this story.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            It has to at least fall under this:

            "§1001. Statements or entries generally Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

            (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 749 ; Sept. 13, 1994, Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), 108 Stat. 2147 .)"

            https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=49&f=treesort&num=1262

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    the single person who voted no: “In the opinion of the chair the nos have it”

    the multiple people who voted “yes” laugh at the absurdity and call him out on it

    how fucking brazen a liar

        • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          I feel like this would be a great addition to congress. Make C-SPAN interactive and viewers can vote on whether or not to have someone involved in a proceeding flogged with something like a 90% majority.

          • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            It would be like the scene in The Simpsons (a really old episode) where the family goes in for group therapy and the counselor hooks them up with shock collars and buttons they can zap each other with, and they just go crazy shocking the shit out of each other.

            Found it.

  • piranhaconda@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Just browsed r/conservative for a bit to see the response there. Pleasantly surprised to see multiple posts where the top comment was something along the lines of “release everything, don’t care who is affected on either side”

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    When he was the only person to say no, and then claimed “the noes have it,” that was the funniest gd thing I’ve seen all day. Hahahahahaha!

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Can someone explain to this non-american why the Democrats are treating this as a successful upset when they could have released the Epstein files during Biden?

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Because they couldn’t, or at least not without potentially ruining the case while it was before the courts at the time?

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Biden likely would have never released it because his donors are on the list, also the general public on the US, if you haven’t caught on yet are like 30% complete idiots. A good example of this is that many people in comments on Instagram or other social media have said ‘‘why would anyone even willingly fly on a plane called ‘the Lolita express’?’’ Because they can’t figure out that the press started calling Epstine’s plane that long after the accusations and convictions were over with. They’re even more confused that the pilot of the plant never saw ANY sexual behavior or implied sexual relationship of any minors on the plane or even adults on the plane. How couldn’t he tell?! Because Epstine was a blackmail con man, not a ‘‘hay everybody here’s all my dirty secrets! Look at this! It’s incriminating!’’ Man. Blackmail necessitates obfuscation, and likewise gaining access to wealthy targets ment he ALSO needs to appear harmless and well connected to other wealthy people, who only saw normal behavior. So this list, the flight logs, even the island visitors, will all be at the very least 50% innocent people, if not way higher numbers. You only need a few successful targets to get by with blackmail and if the targets all have lots of money and know eachother the last thing you want is for them to be aware your blackmailing them all at once. And if he never did blackmail and just ran a pedophile ring, the level of secrecy would still be crazy high and he’d still want to look innocent to the majority of people he knew that’s how all child abusers and rapists in general tend to behave.

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Biden likely would have never released it because his donors are on the list

        Biden wasn’t able to release it because a judge sealed it as part on an ongoing investigation. Don’t let that stop your ridiculous conspiracy theories.

        The same “donors” would likely also support the Democrats now voting to release them.

    • Canaconda@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Politik-brained Canadian here:

      IIRC they didn’t raid Epstein till 2019. In 2020 Democrats had a narrow majority in the house which they would lose in 2022.

      Than January 6, 2021 happened, and I think everyone thought that would be the legal case that brought Trump down.

      It kind of seemed inevitable that the Epstein files would get leaked or released eventually. That is until Trump officially ran again in 2023; creating the possibility that the evidence would be destroyed permanently if he won.

      • Alloi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        just to tie on to this, theres a none zero chance some prominent democrat “old guard” are also on the list, and their positions are too valuable to be lost (to the status quo). january 6th, if it was enough, would have been a great way to protect the old guard and get rid of trump. but thats evidently not what happened.

        i dont care whos on the list, from what side, i want them all punished. anybody whos complicit in the current shit show, or is on that list, needs to be shot in the street like a rabid dog.

        • drhodl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          While I was still on Reddit, there was a list going around of politicians charged with child sex offences. Sure, there were a few Dems, curse them to hell, but by FAR the majority were Republikkklans. The list was up to page 57 last time I sighted it.

      • Ricky Rigatoni@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Than January 6, 2021 happened, and I think everyone thought that would be the legal case that brought Trump down.

        And it might have been if they didn’t drag their feet so much.

    • Wilco@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      The Dems have molesters/rapists on the list themselves. The difference is that we are not cultists and will gladly watch those perverts go to jail. Apparently MAGA just barely started caring about justice as it pertains to the files.

      Why were the files not released under Biden? Hell … Bill Clinton is on the list (shocking).

    • handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s all bread and circuses until the 1% have extracted the last iota of capital from the rest of us and the country finally collapses.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Because they COULDN’T release them under Biden. They were sealed by court order until January 2025.

      There is a lot of desperate “both sides” nonsense going on here but the fact remains, Democrats are voting to release them and Republicans are not. If Democrats wanted to cover them up, why would they be doing that?

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Shhh! Don’t ruin it for the rest of us! On tomorrow’s episode of “As The Empire Crumbles”, will the files lead to anything actionable?

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I don’t see anyone saying this yet, but the Epstein files were sealed by a court order for Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial. They weren’t unsealed until January of 2025. Biden couldn’t have released them without violating the court order that sealed them - and possibly giving Ghislaine’s lawyers a slam dunk to get her off with a mistrial.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Biden couldn’t have released them without violating the court order that sealed them

        Presidents can do whatever they want as long as it’s an official act.

        • Flockwit@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Because Merrick Garland is incredibly lazy. He spent his entire tenure sitting around doing nothing.

            • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              Is there any U.S. administration that should be let off the hook in the last 25 years of ratfuckery? I’ll just be happy if your Democrats are desperate enough to combat overt corruption that they’ll accept collateral damage among theirs and their masters.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Merrick Garland is a hard core libertarian centrist and Biden appreciated him for being status quo which means not rocking the boat or doing any effort to to hold anyone rich accountable as his previous bosses were BP and Amazon.

          He also refused to prosecute Matt Gaetz.

            • Krauerking@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              Its not meant to be an excuse. He just is a shitty person. Picked because they thought it would reach across the shitty aisle to shitty republicans.
              That just is what it is.

            • Krauerking@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              That does nothing to change the reality of his character or negate his lack of action i pointed out above.

              Why did he actually not do anything? Who can say?

        • drhodl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Garland is a republikkkan and a member of the Federalist Society. He was Biden’s greatest failure.

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Its a PR stunt. The democratic establishment doesn’t want them released. The democrats that do, are the minority faction of progressives, and they don’t have enough political power to actually get them released. Biden is not a progressive, he wants the uphold the status quo, including, protecting the Democrats on that list.

      • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Its a PR stunt. The democratic establishment doesn’t want them released.

        That makes no fucking sense whatsoever. Why would they overwhelmingly vote to realease them then?